

Thank you very much. I’ve been vindicated.
Thank you very much. I’ve been vindicated.
Need to factor in terrain and weather conditions too.
It’s about a bunch of pretentious high schoolers in Fort Dodge, Iowa. One of the lead actresses is the daughter of the producer.
You don’t have to agree with an opinion. But people don’t get their own facts.
Oh, OK. Imperial violence. Got it. If you define things narrowly enough, you can never be a hypocrite.
I have a vewy good fwiend in Wome named Biggus Dickus.
The article broadens the connection to violence, not just bombs dropped from aircraft. Qatar has for years supported Islamists in the region, including the Houthis and Muslim Brotherhood. Qatar, like this article, is aligned with Iran.
Rich coming from the Qatar.
You can’t make me tell you.
Someone was careless with their cigarette.
Is Bob Vylan’s name intentionally based on Bob Dylan and meant to rhyme with it?
Hopefully, he will be able to overthrow the city council so he can enact his policies.
I read this as “socks” and thought “What the hippy shit is this?”
Then I realized my error but still wondered the same thing.
The duck phone. The quack when you got a call was annoying, though.
I blame the West for occupying Hong Kong so long that it corrupted their citizens to believe in democracy and capitalism.
It’s thought that this was the ancestral state, and that specialized ducts (eventually nipples) evolved later on eutherian mammals.
Edit: I recognized my error moments later when I realized that marsupials have nipples too. So this evolved after marsupials and eutherians split from monotremes.
Jesus, upon reading the headline I thought this was the result of a massive cartel killing. It was unusual they would dump the corpses at a crematorium, so I pondered it for a moment. Then I thought I had better check the article.
It’s another case of a crematorium administration getting overwhelmed and mishandling bodies. Now, to be fair, the article mentions that the getting overwhelmed part could be due to all the drug murders in Ciudad Juarez. That’s TBD.
The question asks for reasons people who consider it trustworthy do so. That’s nothing like trying to prove a negative. That’s just giving input on why you (may) believe something different from the asker.
Did AI write the headline? Article abstract is about detecting how much AI is in use by looking for an uptick in AI-favored words. Headline is about how scientists found out that AI prefers certain words.
If it were actually about the headline topic, the paper would be fatally flawed.