I guess words change if we use them incorrectly for long enough.

Looking at the etymology, it appears that short sighted started as the medical term, with it’s relation to foresight coming later. It’s also older than nearsighted.

It may be less common in modern contexts, but it’s definitely a “correct” use.

Also: all words are made up and the points don’t matter.

divided by abv

Well it’s probably a good thing you quit!

To nitpick: it’s fair to say his relationships with children were inappropriate. The stipulated behavior crosses a lot of lines of propriety.

The stipulated behavior doesn’t amount to being harmful or abusive.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodhart's_law

Round out the set with refraining

2021, under Biden

People say I’m so unpretentious (for a genius)

Both are standard, just who’s standard.

Never use ai for something you don’t understand! Especially in a niche subject. AI is very good at connecting words that are statistically likely to go together. They’re also biased to produce answers that sound confident.

The end result is an answer that appears correct, and if you don’t know well enough to identify an “apparently correct but factually wrong” answer then you’ll just believe it.

To be fair, it’s the largest black owned farm “near Los Angeles.” At about 250 acres.

I’m having a hard time tracking down the current largest black farm in the US, but it’s at least bridgefortg farms in alabama, with about 10,000 acres.

I got absolute whiplash reading up on this guy’s history.

Aren’t they a little old for that?

70% of the world pisses and moans when america plays world police. 70% of the world pisses and moans when america doesn’t play world police.

How’s the bedbug colony treating you?

I think the golden rule with LLMs is “never trust the output.” If it’s a task you can 100% verify or has virtually no associated risk, then go right ahead.

It’s just so deeply frustrating to keep seeing people look at LLM results and treat them as truthful instead of truthy.

When’s waking and breakfast, though?

Thought this post was going in VERY different direction from the first few sentences!

Or rather, nothing exists until it is perceived?

Counterpoint: affectionate acts form a nearly-continuous spectrum from chaste to extreme. You could draw a line virtually anywhere and still make the argument that the two adjacent acts are basically the same.

This is very similar to how YouTube gets six hours of new content every second.

Anybody can code an application, it takes a software engineer to barely code it.