I guess I’m used to it. Besides, imagine not using a cable at all–even better?

You can still do that with an adapter though?

Indeed, I don’t really see the problem. Instead of a single use port you have a practically universal port. That’s better, surely.

Oh, fair enough then

Why are your earbuds… in your pants

This is how you juice GDP.

It’s called dog-slopping

Stop it, he has an accountability allergy!

Could start with a guillotine for corporations and see how that goes.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/torproject-snowflake/

✨HANDSOME✨

barf

Seems like a dogwhistle confederate flag to me.

I’ve gone the other way. I used to run a Proxmox cluster, then someone gave me a Synology NAS. Now it’s rare that I spin up Proxmox and instead use a mix of VMs, containers and Synology/Synocommunity apps.

Sure, you can do that at an aggregate level, but then how do you divide it by customer? And even then, some setups will be more efficient than others, so you’d only get that setup’s usage.

And even if you do that and can narrow it down to a single user and a single prompt, you can still only roughly predict how long it will think and how long the response will be.

Saved the biggest flame for Australia. Or is it just bushfire season.

What security issue do you imagine arises from creating a Gmail account that receives a single Lemmy verification before the account is deleted?

All my music is stored in a folder on my NAS, broken down by artist, release. It can be accessed via SMB, SFTP, Jellyfin and Plex. From there I stream to what ever device I’m using. Wireguard, Tailscale or Plex is required to stream outside my home. Navidrome sounds interesting.

Or even just use the tailnet domain you can generate.