Ba Dum Tss

You’d be surpised at some of the foods which contain gluten. Take a vegetarian pizza, with some seitan on it? That’s pure gluten.

And the nature of celiacs or non-celiac gluten sensitivity is such — annoyingly, that the symptoms take a while to show up, so it’s unlike say a proper food allergy or lactose intolerance, it’s much harder to actually reason about what you’ve eaten, when the symptoms can show up as late as several days afterwards.

But yeah, ofc that’s not everyone and if it’s not you it’s not you. It just was for me, and now I’m kinda preachy about people trying exclusion diets just to be sure.

A proper cleaning should do it. Make sure all the air holes are clean.

Have you ever tried avoiding gluten for a while?

I get horrible hangovers from having a few light beers, but once I starred avoiding gluten and dairy, I could drink a 3l box of wine in one or two sittings and not have a hangover in between.

Never used to be able to enjoy properly tannined wines. But with the proper diet, I fking love them.

You misspelled “shove”

“The excess”

Yeah no such thing.

Imagine actually asking women if they prefer to have their clitoral hood intact or not.

It’s biologically analogous, it’s the prepuce. Without it, your most sensitive part is constantly exposed to air and friction. Imagine what an eye would look like in 15 years if you were to cut someone’s eyelid off. It would dry and lose vision and just be overall horrible. The glans penis is mucosal as well, so there’d be similarities like keratinisation.

Have I ever wished someone had genitally mutilated me as a baby?

Phone left, keys right, wallet back or right.

Usually when I go outside I have a jacket so jacket pockets, left/right but same applies for trousers.

Wallet for backpacket only on comfortable places.

Removed by mod

Is this going to kill Onlyfans?

Or is the market decidedly because Onlyfans is about personal creators and thus it’s more meaningful than porn?

But when short AI videos become so good you can’t tell if you’re being catfished, will it feel the same?

Well this is kinda easy to understand even as a westerner; you probably consider a gray/flecked pigeon as a something more or less dirty, but a white dove is the sign of purity and whatnot.

Exactly the same animal, just different colouring.

Somehow we just think eating French fries off the ground makes pigeons dirty but doves eating insects is completely fine.

hold onto a thought longer than I.

If you were speaking about someone else, would you use “he/she” or “him/her” in this context?

Because if it’s the former, then you use “I” to replace it, and if it’s the latter, you use “me”.

other people have an ability to hold onto a thought longer than she.

Doesn’t sound right.

other people have an ability to hold onto a thought longer than her.

Sounds better.

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british-grammar/pronouns-personal-i-me-you-him-it-they-etc

https://www.quora.com/Does-the-ISS-use-power-to-heat-or-cool

Only if “Big Freeze” turns out to be more accurate than the “Big Crunch”

“Have you ever sown a field, Lady Olenna? Have you ever reaped a grain? Has anyone in House Tyrell? A lifetime of wealth and power has left you blind in one eye. You are the few, we are the many. And when the many stop fearing the few…”

From your point of view. Your point of view may be the objectively correct one, and I would love if just saying “no more crazy people” meant no more fighting with people who have way too much confidence and zero rationality, but they still might have their own points of view.

And I for one can’t say which is the objectively right one.

For instance I find that my personal preference to abiding Grice’s maxims would be way too detail-oriented, and people usually feel as though I’ve broken the maxim of quantity and quality by “over-serving them” whereas I feel they’re not nearly accurate enough. Or they’re too accurate about something way too irrelevant and I’m very confident in the matter and thus find the quantity of their explanation superfluous.

It’s so much about context and less about what is “objectively right.”

I used to drive a taxi and would have no problem letting other people “set the rules” as it were (people really enjoyed me as a customer service agent in all different jobs I was in, and I’m not just saying that even though ofc everyone would think so becuase I’m saying it myself), but yet I don’t have lots of close personal friends, because I get to actually talk about what’s interesting to me and not just yap about some irrelevant bullshit, people have a different preference to how much they like talking and thinking about things. Mines “more than theirs”. I can accommodate their rules, but they clearly can’t accommodate mine. So it would only make sense for me, the more adaptable one, to adapt, as they’re clearly incapable. Unless I want to be alone.

Would you disagree?

Yeah that headline seems like capitalists trying to calm down the masses.

Sometimes we disagree on what the required amount of information that is needed for a sentence.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative_principle

And sometimes we’re playing the wrong “game”

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_game_(philosophy)

There’s a reason you dislike it so, I wager

It’s not that deep." – dismisses attempts to expose faulty logic by asserting that logic is not necessary in this particular case.[8]

“Lies of the Devil.” – used as a response to any fact that threatens the integrity of an individual or group.[9] “Stop thinking too much.” – redirects attention from the topic, idea, or argument at hand to the alleged overuse of thought itself.[10]

“You clearly care way too much about this topic.” – implies that one’s level of concern or interest in a particular topic or situation is excessive and thus invalidates any further conversation or exploration[2]

“There are worse things in life to worry about.” – implies that less significant issues are not worth addressing since they are not as significant as other issues and implies that a person’s situation is not significant enough to even warrant discussion or action[11]

“It’s all good.” – nullifies, without evidence, any possible debate by asserting the issue is already settled.[12][user-generated source?]

“Here we go again.” – implies that the redundant, cyclical nature of a given disagreement means it will never be resolved.[13]

“So what? What effect does my action have?” – used to dismiss an individual’s involvement in a larger cause on the grounds that one person is too insignificant to ever have a meaningful impact.[2]

“Let’s agree to disagree.” – used to stop discussion of an issue rather than attempt to resolve it;[14] may, however, instantiate a dialectic.

“It is what it is.” – implies that things are unchangeable, therefore there is no point in further discussion.[15]

“Let people enjoy things.” – purports that criticisms to consumable media are attempts to prevent consumers from enjoying said media.[

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought-terminating_cliché

I’m with this guy.

Because like it or not, TV sets an example.

Sometimes it can be used for positive things as well.

Developed in Scandinavia over decades starting in the 1920’s, the concept of a designated driver was imported to the United States on a large scale in 1988 through the Harvard Alcohol Project,[2] an initiative by the Harvard School of Public Health’s Center for Health Communication, led by Jay Winsten. With heavy involvement by television networks and Hollywood studios, the campaign popularized the concept through public service announcements, as well as the encouragement of drunk driving prevention messages and designated driver references in popular television programs,[2] such as Cheers, L.A. Law, and The Cosby Show. The U.S. Department of Transportation used public affairs commercials with the phrase “friends don’t let friends drive drunk”.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Designated_driver