Of course but the count is to discuss pronoun use

And then exporting our culture, so, strap in everybody

“where did Jack leave the forklift”

“HE left it in the warehouse”

No one does the following

“Where did JACK leave the forklift?”

“Jack left the forklift in the warehouse”

The problem is if you go by “she”, the first phrasing is hurtful. But it isn’t common to pop back the person’s name in a reply sentence.

Even more clear is:

“Where did they leave the forklift”

“He left it in the warehouse”

Mind, it may well not be intentional, but a non binary person is made uncomfortable by being misgendered, so in a welcoming and safe workspace they’d want to ask “hey so I actually use she/her, can you please use those in regards to me?”

But in an unsafe or unwelcoming workspace they would either be shamed/retaliated against for that, or (in the case of government offices now) forced to not ask in the first place.

… Unfortunately yes. He just translated money into power

We be prosperin.

Flation be gone

America has excellent healthcare. Swipe your credit card here please and we’ll get started

I’ll admit: I took your original comment to indicate enjoyed consumption and propagation of mis truth. Your comment here seems to be more of an acknowledgement of the danger of misinformation.

Now I don’t know what to do lol

Their words are available on the topic and ada could easily refute them.

“I was there with your mother when it was written. We were cybering at the goldshire inn”.

“the misinformation is popular, despite those involved disregarding it. so I shall believe it.”

?

“if your position is that you CHOSE a job that makes you work on MLK Day, that makes you a dumber worker”.

That user claims they are enunciating neopronouns, but yes, the inconsistent third person syntax fucks it all up

Yeah I think the above comment is inappropriately tying the issue to a topic they specifically said wasn’t the motivation

I like the word crablet

The destruction of the store will mean nothing to wal mart. It’s insured.

Burning it down will cause:

• serious air pollution to the surrounding neighbors, who are innocent
• risk to firefighters who respond
• potential creation of a food desert if wal mart has already driven out competitors, resulting in at risk folks having a harder time accessing food

Why ya reading it?

It would be incorrect to call china an “enemy” of the US,…they are more:

• an adversary on several topics (such as regional territories, relations with Russia on the Ukraine conflict)

• a partner on others (such as trade)

Training an existing model on a specific set of new data is known as “fine tuning”.

A base model has broad world knowledge and the ability to generate outputs of things it hasn’t specifically seen, but a tuned model will provide “better” (fucking yuck to even write it) results.

The closer your training data is to your desired result, the better.

Dey fat?

Clowns will find some other teet