

Nah the bat signal light is a red herring, when the light turns on, it just sends an email to Batman. The light is more about keeping criminals afraid cause you know, Batman likes to scare people.
Nah the bat signal light is a red herring, when the light turns on, it just sends an email to Batman. The light is more about keeping criminals afraid cause you know, Batman likes to scare people.
It also jumped out at me too cause it was literally the opposite of the most true thing about AI.
Sure, you can argue that it helps and that improves productivity in some niche use cases, but by definition, there isn’t anything real there. It’s an empty husk that has been contorted to echo user prompts based on past Q&A.
It’s literally like calling a foot print something real cause you can reconstruct some of the foot.
That makes sense, they want to show ads to people who don’t want to see ads and don’t have time to see many.
IMO it just means advertisement is self defeating in the long run.
Ehhh, Hollywood is pretty obsessed with high school kids in general. I think it has something to do with certain people peaking in high school.
I personally think it’s to do with luck in life, when someone is very fortunate, they diverge from the masses around high school.
Yeah idk why this model never took off, I’m guessing cause of greed.
Give me a wallet, I can fill it with watching ads and then use it for your service.
I think the reason why it doesn’t work is because it allows the user to minimize their ad exposure, not maximize.
If you have a job that you can be confidently wrong without any self awareness after the fact, then yeah I guess.
But I can’t think of many jobs like that except something that is mostly just politics.
Cause it allows you to have a Ponzi scheme in which you always assume the future will be more prosperous.
If money loses its value, that puts pressure on people with money to use it and try to turn it into more.
So unless your willing to lose money due to inflation, you HAVE TO get a return on your investment, thereby ensuring perpetual growth.
It works well when there is tons of room to grow, but then it all falls apart when you run out of that.
Once that happens, you just keep increasing the money supply, allowing capital holders to increase at a faster rate than workers. Even though workers “make more”, they have a smaller share of the pie.
Just gonna say, I bet it has something to do with their demographics and how there are lots of gen Zs there, not only they got something to fight for, they got lots to fight with
EA can always keep printing money by putting out the same sport games every year, how the fuck did they get into $36 billion debt? I’m not even mad, that’s impressive.
Oh a new kind of advanced glasses, does it zoom or auto adjust to your prescription?
Reads article
Wait are they seriously trying google glass again? Why is it always the solution looking for a problem people the same as the supply side people. They don’t understand that demand is the real driver.
Well that’s just clever naming
Better than being judged by a murder
But in the short to medium term, there are much more reliable, efficient, and cost-effective platforms that can take over in these situations: robots with arms, but with wheels instead of legs.
I never understood why the first generation of robots can’t just be on wheels. Even if it needs to go up and down stairs often, it’s still easier to have legs just for stairs and resort to wheels all other times.
The article also thinks battery life is an issue. IMO too many things have batteries, why can’t it just rely on a power cord. Sure that won’t work in some situations, but damn it it can fold my laundry.
Man. My decision to go with Jellyfin just keeps paying off more and more
Idk how I can just pick one,
But the stage by avenged sevenfold is a good contender
Nope, I read the top second cause I thought I should start from the top
I’m honestly impressed that it’s still a thing
Holy shit, sounds like this would enable people to have a community in which m every person has a Jellyfin and they each use all of them.
One person could specialize in documentaries and another in shows.
Combined, it would mean a huuuge library.
I wonder how high demand content would work. As in, if a TV show is watched a lot, could it be saved in multiple servers and the swarrm figure out who streams from what to balance demand?
IMO this community is more about questions that are obvious to some but not others, hence why some might think they are stupid questions. This example question is something that isn’t common sense for the majority, so yeah imo it’s the wrong community to ask in.
It’s kind of like that comic and being today’s lucky 10,000