

finally a proper use case for this saying
finally a proper use case for this saying
same way that because someone has a brain, doesn’t make them intelligent
the only ethical leather
your birthday suit is still fine,
ok.
but the problem is that real therapy is expensive, and unaccessible, while AI is freely accessible, even though it’s shit.
and open ai is profiting from that.
I’m just saying the blame should be aimed at the corporations and the healthcare system, rather than someone who is desperate for help
Developed world, we should follow medical advice for water quality
US, no fluoride in water, only lead.
The only evidence that fluoride makes you stupid, is that you probably grew up drinking fluoridated water, and say stupid shit like that.
who turned on the “manufacturing consent” machine?
yhea 9° is still shorts and t-shirts weather for me.
is that a hypothetical?
when there’s lead in US drinking water the government just ignores it if it’s in a poor neighborhood
the most legit Nobel prizes
hey, I (now dead lemm.ee about) posted it first,
they took ma votes
same, and my apartment complex is refusing to fix the AC.
Neither is mutually exclusive, but most likely, both of those.
yhea, but there are different degrees of BS
they need therapy, obviously they need help, and blaming them for not doing the most reasonable thing that might be unaffordable is even stupider.
blame predatory AI, openai could in a single afternoon make it so Chatgpt recomends or even helps you find a local therapist, instead of enabling this for profit.
that’s easy to say, but when someone is in a crisis, I would be wrong to judge then for talking to an AI (shitty terrible solution) instead of a therapist that can be unaffordable and also comes with a risk of then being terrible.
came to say this,
Nobel price of economics is BS for bankers and rich finance people to promote their propaganda.
MAGA
yet here we are