deleted by creator

No man’s sky was a bit different. They massively over promised in the initial marketing and couldn’t get it done.

No I don’t think so. Nuclear is super effective and consistent, especially for large setups.

Using renewables while we get our nuclear up makes complete sense. And subsidising nuclear with renewables after that also makes sense.

But the technology to rely entirely on renewables isn’t really there either.

We’re reaching the point where discussing cost in regard to the energy crisis makes us look like fucking idiots.

Imagine what kids reading the history books are going to think of these discussions.

And 10 years isn’t that long really. If someone said we could use no fossil fuels in energy generation in 10 years time that doesn’t sound long at all.

Tbf we are noises as fuck. We’ve been sending so much out for decades.

We did this for a friend’s birthday at uni. There were about 20 of us. Great night haha

I used to love texting these numbers when drunk.

It wasn’t programmed for any questions. It was trained hehe

That’s not what LLMs are for. That’s like hammering a screw and being irritated it didn’t twist in nicely.

The turing test is designed to see if an AI can pass for human in a conversation.

Actually the videos get stitched together dynamically.

When you add a new ability you could register it in a OnAttack or whatever list for that character.

Then you can just loop that list and activate them all.

For the majority of commercial users they literally don’t give a fuck either. It’s on techies that really care about his stuff sadly.

Wetware is my new least favourite word.

But super interesting tech.

There were no front pages like Reddit or Facebook.

Everyone had their own site and hosting was stupidly cheap.

You could host your own videos for very little. You didn’t need to rely on external services like YouTube.

You found websites by word of mouth or by links on the sites you visit. It was an age of discovery. It was awesome.

As content was self hosted there wasn’t any private censorship of content. And as it was cheap people weren’t desperately trying to monetize everything to stay a float.

It was so completely different it’s legit hard to explain.

We know very little about it at this point. It doesn’t reek of anything, seems like you’re just making assumptions based on very little information.

Apparently valve doesn’t really assign teams to certain projects. People can work on what projects they like and things organically get people behind them if they are looking good or interesting.

This means games that do get completed are often really good and ones that weren’t looking good fizzle out.

It’s an interesting approach for sure. I think it makes sense rather than steaming ahead with a bad game. On the flip side what could be an interesting product may die out.

It’s happened several times to half life 3 apparently.

The problem is most people only post when they do have issues or they give everything 5 stars if it’s as expected.

I find ignoring 1 and 5 star reviews helps with this issue.

Medical test for competency would make sense.

My point is forced retirement is basically ageist.

I don’t think so. One you’d lose Bernie. Two it’s a bit harsh to assume anyone over a certain age isn’t mentally capable of governing or changing with the times.

I think term limits would serve you much better.

I didn’t say LLM. AI has existed since the 50s/60s. Fuzzy matching is an AI technique.

They do it much better than anything you can hard code currently.