“Best” is highly subjective. What are your actual goals? Most people are suggesting emulation for a reason. Getting a better answer needs a better definition of what you want.
Because you can also get one of the Gameboy store display kiosks, as ridiculous as they are. Original hardware, on a large display.
Very important detail from the article:
The man fled on foot after being approached by the officers, drew his weapon and opened fire, Quinn said.
That’s the reason why the Secret Service shot him. Although it’s still unclear what made him “suspicious” for officers to approach him.
“Tailor it to something that humans would actually like”
Then proceeds to list foods that most people stop eating after college, if not before. And not just junk food, but the worst versions of junk food. When was the last time you heard a grown-ass adult call Domino’s delicious? Or a McDonald’s Big Mac, the poster child of the pedo-in-chief and his toddler-like palette?
I appreciate Nile, and I’ll watch the rest later, but the foundation is not sound on this one.
Besides, his goal is almost exactly why Soylent exists. Many similar products from competitors even taste amazing. I use one that tastes like melted ice cream.
This REALLY depends on context. What kind of uniform? What kind of public event? Who is nearby? How are they acting?
The possibilities range from completely benign and uninteresting to some that warrant arrest, and everything in between.
They say it’s to get her to speak about Epstein. Except you don’t grant a pardon for that sort of thing- you grant immunity. Potentially even for things she’s already been convicted of, although that gets really complicated.
The only way to pardon her that ends in justice is if her testimony leads to enough serious convictions. But at that point, her testimony is tainted, and any defense counsel would jump on it.
It’s not automatic, but MSNBC can sue to recover those fees. However, it’s still a pretty high bar.
The shirts do seem pretty random, but H&M is fast fashion. There’s a ton of things that can only be described as “throw everything at the wall and see what sticks”
As for dead vs alive, we celebrate tons of dead celebrities. Recently I’ve been seeing a lot of Nirvana shirts, featuring Kurt Cobain’s face, and he’s been dead for 30 years. Similar stories for many bands from the 60s/70s.
Even if we limit it to painters, most people can name (or at least recognize) a bunch of dead painters. How many living painters do you know of? Would people recognize their most famous works?
Without exception, whenever someone complains about “freedom of speech”, XKCD 1357 applies.
If law enforcement won’t help, then you’ll need a lawyer who can get a court to issue a subpoena. This would probably be in the context of stalking/restraining order.
I can almost guarantee that Facebook, with its extensive data mining, knows exactly who it is.
Most ads aren’t directly tied to a sales goal. Instead they work on brand recognition. IOW, when you are at the grocery store, you think of Coke in general rather than any specific ads. And when you’re looking for a new car, Ford’s marketing is constantly in the back of your mind.
Combined with the tsunami of marketing everyone faces every single day, few of these ads stand out. You likely don’t turn down buying Coke because of how invasive their ads are.
They used to. Or rather, the industry used to. Most of those players have since folded, largely because of them becoming known for crap quality.
Good news on the EV charging part, at least in North America. Most (if not all) manufacturers have agreed to switch to NACS, and most have adapters to work with either connector. There will be a long tail as the old connectors fade away, but the future is looking standardized.
I seem to recall this not being very effective, but I can’t find any studies right now either way. Lots of marketing, and a little bit of anecdotes, but no studies.
The idea being that they get used to it and just ignore it, because they want to bite their nails. At best it serves as a reminder when they do.
Level 1 charging can work for a lot of people, but it ends up needing a lot more mental energy. You have to more carefully calculate capacity/range, daily needs, charging speeds, variances, and unexpected needs. The end result being that it’s not a great experience.
Level 2, even at the slowest speeds, are enough that you can fully recharge most vehicles overnight. And you have enough capacity to last through the day unless you are a super commuter or drive professionally.
Used EVs are remarkably cheap. The problem is that it still effectively requires you to be able to charge at home, which is not common on cheaper housing.
Cartman was the first person I ever heard use it, by at least a decade. These days I hear a relatively small number of people use it regularly.
Wanda Sykes did a PSA about this. It was put on YouTube 17 years ago. I don’t know when it first aired.
Now I feel old…
It was used in an old Gatorade ad. Is this what you’re thinking of?
It will become a more specialized, niche knowledge. It’s similar to cars. In the 1950s, it was extremely common for regular people to know how to fix their own car. But as cars became more reliable and complex, fewer and fewer now know how. There’s still a definite market for mechanics and mechanical engineers, but it’s a specialty line. You go to college, or generally go through a manufacturer’s training program.
What’s going to change are the expectations and expertise going in. When Microslop wants new developers, or support staff, or whatever else, the candidates aren’t going to be (as) familiar with it going in. They won’t be able to meaningfully apply their knowledge of similar systems and products.
They’ll have to bring back extensive company-led training programs.
This will apply to every large tech company, regardless of field. In your networking example, it would probably be run by Cisco, which isn’t too different from how it is today.
It being a coin toss is the result of their fumbling. Long before his decline was obvious, and across many races, Democrats were underperforming.
It’s definitely due to their planning/messaging. Obama won with huge margins on both presidential campaigns, running on a message people believed in. No one since has come close, either in messaging or results.