… you mean that thing we were talking about?
… you mean that thing we were talking about?
I mean… the PO shouldn’t have come in at 5:01 if they wanted it approved that day. That’s just rude.
I work in document control, so I’m sending documents between companies regularly. Often, at the end of the week someone will dump a 100+ document transmittal on us half an hour before the end of the day. And then they go home.
You bet your ass that shit is waiting til Monday.
I mean… you didn’t say anything else, how else could you have meant it? You even complained that them leaving on time was inconvenient when someone else dumped something in their desk after working hours.
Apparently they’re up to three years now. Woo.
That is 100% not how you framed your initial comment. It was very much focused on how the workers weren’t going above and beyond to work when they didn’t have to.
Sounds to me like they were reacting to a shit situation in the most appropriate way they could.
So you’re saying they should have worked less?
So… they knew the value of their own time and didn’t overwork when they didn’t have to?
Most office workers could probably learn from that mindset.
Good luck finding new ones in the US.
They had a site redesign to garner more monetization.
You must not’ve been on reddit 10+ years ago.
They’re basically online loyalty accounts like you’d have at retail stores.
Wouldn’t that fall under the basic necessities part of OPs post?
How my actions affect other people.
“Don’t hate the companies, hate the people who lobbied for copyright laws… the companies!”
“A lot” is an interesting descriptor, especially when comparing loud easily defined groups with quieter more subtle groups.
Its the difference between those animals that puff themselves out to five times their normal size and those that prefer not to be seen at all. Are there a significant portion of the first as compared to the second, just because you see them more blatantly?
Perhaps that’s the level of chocolate? Like you can have 90% dark chocolate, this is 40%.
That’s a pretty popular opinion, actually.
He is more hated, yes, but a lot of the people who hate him will vote for him anyway because they’ve been led to believe the alternative is the end of civilization as they know it.
Who does no. 2 work for?
Do you know how long it takes to do everything?
Eternity. I doubt even with all time forever you’d be able to do everything. Our world is ever-changing, much less the wider universe.
The one stipulation I’d put on living forever is the ability to change with the universe. Who’s to say physics will even allow us to perceive reality in a few billion years, if we’re stuck the way we are?