Admin of lemmy.blahaj.zone
I can also be found on the microblog fediverse at @ada@blahaj.zone or on matrix at @ada:chat.blahaj.zone
- 23 Posts
- 1.1K Comments
Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•How open are you about yourself to others online in general?
13·5 天前I’ve been using my real name on the internet for 30 years or so now. I’ve hosted public radio shows, I run/admin several online LGBTQ communities and I’ve had newspapers articles done about my transition and activism.
It’s absolutely possible that someone with the desire could utilise that against me. But it’s unlikely and it hasn’t happened yet. And in the mean time, having to hold myself back and be constantly on edge about what I say and where I say it would impact my use of the internet in a way I don’t like, every single time I use it.
So for me, it’s worth the risk.
Iceland?
Though prices are high in Iceland. Their wages are also high, which offsets that, but if you’re coming in with foreign currency/income, you’ll feel the prices more…
It doesn’t really match my experience though. I’m one of those rare ADHD folk who has zero issues with sleep.
Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
You Should Know@lemmy.world•If you have ANY Canadian ancestor, you are likely a Canadian citizen as a result of recent changes in Canadian law
201·6 天前If you were born or adopted before December 15, 2025
Citizenship may have been restored or given to people who were born outside Canada in the second generation or later before December 15, 2025.
This means that in most cases you’re automatically a Canadian citizen if you were born
- before December 15, 2025
- outside Canada to a Canadian parent
This rule also applies to you if you were born to someone who became Canadian because of these rule changes.
If this change made you a Canadian automatically, but you don’t want to be one, you can apply to give up (renounce) your Canadian citizenship.
Adopted people are likely eligible to apply for Canadian citizenship through a direct grant for adopted people if they were born and adopted outside Canada in the second generation or later before December 15, 2025.
Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Pascal (GTX 1070) on Arch after NVIDIA 590... what’s the sane long-term path?
36·7 天前It will compile and install the module for you. All it means is that whenever your kernel is updated, the install process will take around 5 minutes longer than it otherwise would whilst it compiles the dkms module for you.
If you use the lts kernel package, your kernel updates will be infrequent.
If you use the regular arch linux kernel package, it will update every few weeks like it does now, and each time, your package installation process will run a few minutes longer due to the need to compile the driver
I’ve got one already, with pedals. But I don’t have dedicated space to use it, so it never comes out :\
The PS5 lets me play Gran Turismo with VR. and turn by using the gyro function on the controller, effectively mimicking a dedicated steering wheel by turning the controller itself rather than stick steering. I could use a wheel, but without a dedicated space to keep the wheel, setting it up and packing it down is just too much of an issue. Gyro steering gives me much of the same control as a wheel does, but without the hassle.
So gyro steering and VR together was a game changer for me. They were so amazing that I can’t play racing games any other way now…
But VR on the PS5 is basically dead in the water, so hardly any games support it, and gyro steering is basically unheard of in most racing games. So it’s pretty much Gran Turismo…
In theory it’s technically possible to use the PS VR headset on my PC, and configure gyro steering, but so far, the combination of getting them all working and configured correctly AND finding a game that supports it all has defeated me…
Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoLemmy Support@lemmy.ml•lemmy client that allows custom default feed sorting and filtering
1·8 天前They all pretty much let you set the default view in your preferences somewhere
Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Is it wiser to store one savings in Gold as superior to the average bank/savings accounts nominal interest?
5·9 天前But you’re also betting that the economy will come back alive soon enough because without it all you have is a heavy pile of metal.
You probably don’t even have that. Unless you have your own vault, someone else is holding it for you, and if things collapse far enough, good luck ever seeing it
Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•[Answered] Does Lemmy need a fork or a rewrite due to its maintainers views?English
26·10 天前It’s also not a fork
My relationship with gender didn’t so much manifest that way.
Before I came out and accepted myself, I openly told myself I “should have been a girl”, but I also believed I wasn’t, and that was that. I didn’t really feel anything at the idea of femininity. That was my experience of feeling gender
This is just regular moderation, though.
It’s using the existing tool, but making a small portion of them (approving applications) available to a much larger pool of people
it doesn’t resolve the question I raised about what happens when two instances disagree about whether an account is a bot.
If the instance that hosts it doesn’t think it’s a bot, then it stays, but is blocked by the instance that does think its a bot.
And if the instance that thinks its a bot also hosts it, it gets shut down.
That is regular fediverse moderation
Yeah, but that’s after the fact, and after their content has federated to other instances.
It doesn’t solve the bot problem, but just plays whack a mole with them, whilst creating an ever large amount of moderation work, due to it federating to multiple instances.
Solving the bot problem means stopping the content from federating, which either means stopping the bot accounts from registering, or stopping them from federating until they’re known to be legit.
I mean, approving users, you just let your regular established users approve instance applications. All they need to do is stop the egregious bots from getting through. And if there is enough of them, the applications will be processed really quickly. If there is any doubt about an application, let them through, because they can be caught afterwards. And historical applications are already visible, and easily checked if someone has a complaint.
And if you don’t like the idea of trusted users being able to moderate new accounts, you can tinker with that idea. Let accounts start posting before their application has been approved, but stop their content from federating outwards until an instance staff member approves them. It would let people post right away without requiring approval, and still get some interaction, but it would mitigate the damage that bots can do, by containing them to a single instance.
My point is, there are options that could be implemented. The status quo of open sign ups, with a growing number of bots doesn’t have to be the unquestioned approach going forward.
How do you figure that? There’s nothing centralised about it










I’m not saying that I agree with right wing transphobia, and I condemn transphobia, but sometimes, do you ever think that actually, maybe transphobia is a good thing?
That’s how your post reads