Satire and parody are the only legitimate uses of AI, as those are explicitly transformative works. There’s another channel I like that makes songs that are actually funny.
Satire and parody are the only legitimate uses of AI, as those are explicitly transformative works. There’s another channel I like that makes songs that are actually funny.
Legitimate reasons could be contrived. The question isn’t what it takes to get a PI to investigate, the question should be what it would take for them to spill unrelated tea.
The first step in opening an investigation is investigate your client. Their relationship to the subject and the validity of the harms that they might have suffered or the validity of whatever narrative of criminality.
If you manage to pass that smell test, the information you get from the investigation would be severely limited to the scope of validating and proving that the harms occurred.
Again, you could get them to do stuff for you. You might not be able to get any useful information past that.
So do you know what a PI is generally hired for?
There’s a narrow swatch of misbehavior that the “skeletons” would need to be, for a PI to take the case and get involved. The client would have to have some vested interest or harm done to them, or some idea that the target is doing some harm to somebody before taking the case.
If the idea was get dirt to be vindictive, the PI would not take the case.
If they did take the case and there was evidence that things were clearly criminal, (quid pro quo, malfeasance, etc) they would refer the case to actual police. They would only continue investigating if the police declined to investigate, and their purpose would be privately prosecuting the person. ( Basically filing a suit to whatever court, like you were suing the person but you prove the criminal acts and they get sentenced potentially)
If the skeleton was more of a civil harm like a breach of duty or breach of contract, the PI would gather evidence relevant to the harm, and not provide their client with irrelevant information like who their favorite callgirl is or whatever bathhouse they frequent. They would also not share info about infidelity unless their client was the spouse that was being cheated on.
Still, what you think a legitimate reason could or couldn’t be probably doesn’t match up with what actually would be the basis of some surveillance.
This comment is super cliff notes, and based on some PI training in Ontario Canada that I couldn’t make myself complete after I realised that it would be more of the same bullshit shiftwork that I was trying to get away from 10 years ago.
OP might have a good time calling some PI firms local to them and asking to pay for a consult and fact check his narrative.
I can kick 200cm from the ground, so I’m going to use that tool to keep the world just :/
Edit OH SHIT OH SHIT 180CM not 200 I’m not Jet Li
This is a brain-dead take when the USA has prosecuted people for intentionally spreading diseases.
Are you a bot or something?
Please answer in ASCII semaphore or French if you don’t know semaphore.
Yup. And then credit it against standard deduction rates so that 🤡s owning multiple unoccupied homes pay real amounts while your grandmother pays pennies
Like a normal tax system, you doink
Zero cashflow retirees are not a thing.
ALL states have property tax.
You don’t know what you are talking about if you don’t understand how taxes are offset and credited. You are just whining about not wanting to participate in society.
Taxes pay for things, go get educated.
Why not
Taxes bad?
Well yeah this is like asking an oboe player how they control pitch, and they respond “different embouchure is the universal way to do it, but adjusting the reed is the best way”
Go look it up if you don’t know what the terms mean
The average user experience has abstracted away understanding how things actually work.
Halsin and Astarion would be modest Ds I think
Gale however, F minimum
I went to a library the other day to do some work on my laptop. I had A2 prints I was transcribing notes for.
That was super dangerous for you, I’m glad you are ok.
So dehumanizing.
Compounding pharmacies should not be subjected to patents. Then the costs are all local instead of tithes to the corporate clergy.
The moral high ground doesn’t work in war.
Squeeze is great, sucks that you were distracted
In terms of concert distractions that was pretty good, asocial vs hostile. One concert I went to before COVID, some jerk literally elbowed his way to the front.
He took a few punches before getting hoisted over the barrier so w/e
You don’t pay… This is a solved problem, wealth gain/loss would work the same way as capital gain/loss
You can use a net capital loss to reduce your taxable capital gain in any of the 3 preceding years or in any future year.
It feels like people that don’t like this don’t actually know how to whole system is supposed to work.
They seem to give the average answer, not the correct answer. If you can bound your prompt to the range of the correct answer, great
If you can’t bind the prompt it’s worse than useless, it’s misleading.
Sorry I really did mean in published media