bright

Sure, it’s not so hard to do when it’s on someone ELSE’S continent.

I assume you meant “dominate”

Right, good article, she couldn’t then but can now, yet she chooses not to in order to help the lives of regular people

Damn their kidneys must be monsters to process that much water every time they eat a little fishy

EDIT:

Actually it turns out they spit out all the water before swallowing. Makes much more sense

Their throat pouch can hold over 3 gallons (13 liters) of water, but they drain the water before swallowing their prey.

https://earthsky.org/earth/pelicans-are-the-masters-of-air-land-and-water/

• She likely could afford a car since she has a mayor’s salary, but wisely chooses to ride the bus because of its many benefits to society

Exactly. It’s weird to me that anyone doesn’t view posts this way. It’s the default. It shows you everything, and you just block the small number of communities you actively don’t want to see

I disagree, it looks like quite bad engineering to me

That looks like some truly dumbass nonsense

College radio and commercial-free independent radio. Streaming over the net of course

This needs to be the rop comment.

I think OP meant is the image of trump here real

Interesting, I’ve never owned a cat who would hurt me for doing this. (Aside from the occasional cut when they accidentally got a bit too rough.)

The company recently changed the 5 minute required wait down to 3 minutes.

Your confused about what I’m saying. The ARRAY OF RADAR STATIONS is emitters. I’m saying THE ATTACKERS AGAINST the array of radar stations only need to be passive detectors.

That’s the topic of the thread your replying in. Quote:

you could theoretically make a moderately large distributed array sprinkled over a few square kilometers

Your information about passive radar detection is not up to date. There are tons of passive detection of radar systems that by design do zero emission. The radar array stations will need to emit in order to function, but the enemy can find those radar emitters without emitting any energy of their own

https://daronmont.com.au/products/passive-radar

I’m not understanding. Let’s say army A has a radar array of 500 relatively cheap radar stations. They clump them all into a 1 square km area. So now army Z drives some howitzers nearby (which aren’t detectable by ground based radar), waits till a radar station turns on, the passively locates the radar base station, and shoots a cheap shell at it which destroys it.

But if you say army A has the level of military equipment that can locate and destroy howitzers up to 30 km away in all directions, then what benefit does an array of concentrated radar stations provide?

Locating radar emissions is a passive process, it doesn’t reveal your own location. That’s why i said the radar array would have to have very strong defenses extending out 30 km in all 360 degree directions from each individual radar station. And if a group has that strong a level of military equipment already then i don’t see why they would need this huge redundant array of radar stations all concentrated in a small area.

Locating the radar base station? No that’s the easiest part. Radar is like turning on a Hollywood style searchlight pointing up into the sky. The instant you turn it on its extremely obvious where the radar searchlight is coming from

Unless I’m missing something in your plan i don’t think that would work well. If these radar stations aren’t surrounded by very serious defensive systems for hundreds of miles in every direction, then they’ll simply be blown up by dumb howitzer shells that only cost around 2000 dollars.

Howitzers are cheap, relatively long range, mobile, and accurate enough. If you don’t have strong enough defenses to prevent the howitzers from moving into range, then they’ll just blow up all your radar stations with cheap shells.