• Lucy :3@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Maybe the problem is not Firefox here, but Apple.
    Apple does not allow other browsers than Safari on iOS. All other browsers are just reskins of Safari.

    • kratoz29@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Apple does not allow other browsers than Safari on iOS. All other browsers are just reskins of Safari.

      And yet only Brave blocks ads effortlessly…

      Of course it is an Apple issue in the core, but unless Firefox includes a proper ad blocking frautre (no add-ons needed because that’s unlikely to happen in iOS) is also a Firefox issue, and I I’d say the main reason why it loses market when competing against Brave in such a closed environment.

      • Lucy :3@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Imo builtin AdBlockers is much worse than addons. You have no free choice, have to trust that the devs will provide updates regularly and accurately (in contrast to just switching to another AdBlocker when eg. uBlock breaks), and are fucked once they decide it’s too much work/Google pays them a nice sum to not block them/they decide to just replace the ads instead of removing them.

        Addons on iOS, just as on Android, are very much needed and an actual solution to a whole plethora of problems, that no browser on its own could ever solve.

        • kratoz29@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yes, I don’t think anyone thinks otherwise, but built in adblockers are better than DNS adblockers, which consecutively are better than nothing lol (also you could pair both I guess and get an improved experience).

        • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s not a great suggestion for the stated use case of a mobile device which, presumably, will be leaving the pihole’s network frequently.

          • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Tailscale, zerotier, or any other VPN server on your home network can keep your mobile device on your pihole network regardless of physical location.

              • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                I’m going to reject that criticism in this particular case. PiHole is a significantly more complex setup than Tailscale or ZeroTier. While I agree that it is beyond expectations for the “average person”, so is PiHole.

                An OpenVPN server on a dynamic IP address is not that far beyond the skillset of the average PiHole user, especially if they are using an open source router with OpenVPN and DDNS preinstalled.

                Tailscale or ZeroTier are well within the capabilities of a PiHole user.

                • kratoz29@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I have tried it and while it works, DNS adblocking (and the hassle to remember to turn on the VPN for browsing) doesn’t works as good nor is as smooth as using a browser with AdBlock support, or Ublock Origin extension.