• partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    126
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is big! Grid scale Sodium Ion battery technology is (on paper) the best candidate for cheap large scale electricity storage. The fact that this company is working on 9 pilot deployments mean that this will likely produce the real world results that the paper exercises promise.

    There are SO MANY advantages of Sodium Ion battery tech for grid storage over everything else we’ve used so far (nearly all Lithium based).

    Sodium Ion batteries:

    • don’t have as intense thermal management needs Lithium chemistries
    • don’t have the massive negative environmental impact for their source materials (because its a part of regular old table/sea salt)
    • doesn’t have the massive swings in capacity when operated in extreme hot or cold temperatures. Sodium Ion doesn’t care.

    The only downsides to Sodium Ion is that the batteries are physically larger for the same amount of energy stored (which isn’t a problem for stationary storage), and the charging/discharging curves are not as linear as other chemistries (which again, isn’t an issue because these are purpose built applications where the curves can easily be managed by battery management systems).

    • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      What about the environmental impact of degraded sodium ion batteries?

      I’m not going to take sodium mining into account, as there are many ways that it can be extracted, with probably minimal impact, like salt evaporation ponds. I assume it’s less destructive than building a hydro dam.

    • yaroto98@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      2 days ago

      I would happily dedicate a corner of my garage for a big sodium ion battery.

      Also, fun fact they can charge and discharge faster than lithium ion. Also, their chemistry doesn’t lead to spontaneous combustion. Perfect for a house backup.

      • bryndos@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think it’s the fire thing that is really their killer feature. So to speak.

    • Gsus4@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      I love this too, I just hope they don’t use too much Phosphorous, because those reserves are limited too, maybe there are alternative designs once this gets going.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Would container ships be a good application? Or too heavy/large?

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m really excited about na-ion, if commercial BMS circuitry was available I would already have some for a few home automation and sensing projects because of their low temp performance alone. But I’ll have to spin up a custom implementation with an arduino or something and I don’t have that kind of skills lol.

    • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      everything else we’ve used so far (nearly all Lithium based).

      We have used water before lithium, and it isn’t bad at all.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        We have used water before lithium, and it isn’t bad at all.

        Not so great in a flat dry desert though. Pump storage is great when there is lots of water and a naturally occurring elevation, but there’s lots of places on Earth that don’t have that, but do have energy to store.

            • naeap@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              Not sure why you’re getting down voted, as you’re sadly correct here

              Still better then many alternatives, but it’s not as environmental friendly as it’s advertised

  • Cocopanda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 day ago

    I work for a controller OEM that builds the brains for managing these systems. It’s cutting edge stuff.

    • Gsus4@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      The part that controls/balances the discharge profiles, right? Because sodium batteries have a more non-linear discharge pattern.

      • Cocopanda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        18 hours ago

        It is what controls when to inject back up power to shave peak power, the brains to know when to use the grid when it costs the least and then it knows when to balance the solar with the back up to shave peak power.

        Check us out at Ampra Grid. It’s not for residential use. Mainly for massive industrial use. Msrp of about 19,400$.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          That the controller price or does it include the battery as well? What’s installation look like?

          • Cocopanda@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Just the controller. We don’t supply or fabricate anything power wise. We just have the connector that does the brains of the power management. It talks through cellular.

  • Womble@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It would be nice to see a price/GWh of this (along with running costs, it says they save 1 Million per GWh, how much were the running costs before!?), but any improvement in battery tech is definitely a good thing.

    • Gsus4@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Finally something the EU can invest those 600 billion in. Or buy it, like lots of EU startups were by FAANG companies years ago. Tramp says it’s dead tech, so it’s ok.

      • themurphy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I honestly dont care who develops these kind of technologies, because it will spread.

        The impact of these products are too important.