There may be an age or generational explanation for this, but I especially notice this behavior on Reddit while not nearly as much here on Lemmy (though maybe that’s also a mater of implementation).

It seems many are so quick to assert overly-confident positions, but then hit-and-run with some smarmy remark at even the slightest challenge, then quickly block. Like, not even crazy stuff. Just basic, civil disagreements. I can pretty well predict when it will happen, and it always feels like such a petty ego-sparing fingers-in-ears denial thing to do, and to me if anything shows they were not very confident in their views being challenged.

I think I’ve only blocked a handful of people over a decade who were actively spamming, stalking, or spewing extremely hateful rhetoric and I just reported them simultaneously. You have to cross a pretty extreme and irrational line for me to do that.

The reason I ask is to see if I’m missing something; to better understand the mindset of those who do.

  • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    I’ve been online since BBS days. Never blocked anyone. Never could understand why people do that. Just ignore them, whatever.

    So many people, later on down the road have something to say worthwhile that I wouldn’t have known if I just blocked them. Gotta give some leeway on the internet, no one really knows tone or intent most of the time.

    • lennybird@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Yeah I have a similar mindset. I honestly have a lot of people tagged on here from some pretty rough debates at times. But weeks, months, years later I still up vote some of their stuff.