I’ve been watching the Solder Smoke direct conversion receiver challenge build and thinking of maybe building it from parts I already have laying around… assuming I wind my own toroids. I haven’t noticed anyone talking about antenna stuff. What is the deal here?

This is the principal video series primer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLjxU2rMeXw

It is also on hackaday too.

Is there some rule about antenna where a more specialized element is required at specific frequencies? I know I’m missing fundamental practical information here as the wave length for 7 MHz is around 43 meters. Even a quarter wave length would involve a house spanning wire. So what gives, what high school fundamental have I forgotten?

  • 667@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Great questions, one which highlights my own knowledge gap beyond knowing that for a given feedline and antenna combination, you’ll have some measure of impedance. At the most basic level, your radio will “see” some impedance value. In the amateur radio world this is generally 50Ω. If our antenna system (feedline + radiator) presents 450Ω (quite common), we use a 9:1 transformer to get it to match. This allows us to use our radio on that system without (1) stray current returning to the radio and damage our transmission circuits, and (2) at full power but with inherent loss of signal owing to antenna inefficiency.

    Case in point, I have a commercially-purchased multi-band EFHW antenna which presents varying amounts of impedance to the radio. This system includes a transformer (I think it’s 9:1) so that on the bands of interest, there’s a resistance match and as a result an SWR that’s suitable to make decent transmissions on.

    As a tangential example, J-pole antennas have a built-in matching system which uses no special parts. It’s composed of a matching section and radiator. The combination of matching section, radiator length, and physical feedpoint allow this type of antenna to sort of self-manage impedance.

    The difference here is that a j-pole is a monoband antenna, and a long wire with transformer can often be functional on many bands, depending on length, where the lowest useable frequency is the inverse of its length.

    • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      So by using a transformer, I think you are essentially lowering the voltage to exchange for current. What I do not understand, assuming that simple assumed relationship is correct, is why it is still at thing people do. Like if we lived in the old days of vacuum tubes or bipolar junction transistors, sure it makes sense that a little more current might help. Now, in the era of rail to rail op amps with JFET inputs, I don’t understand why anyone needs to create the Eddy current losses of a transformer. Maybe it is safety from transients? But then why attenuate… and why not resistively for a more simple RLC element… very curious now…

      • 667@lemmy.radio
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        There is certainly a lot to learn, and you would benefit greatly from joining the hobby officially. If you are US-based, you can take the amateur radio exam after memorizing the answers for the exam (a legal and encouraged practice), the exam itself can be administered remotely via Zoom.

        I am beyond my technical knowledge if I tried to explain why we use transformers to get an impedance match; I only know what we do.

        • fullsquare@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          transformers are not the only way to do this, and some other circuits can be used instead. if you take a transformer with 1:2 winding ratio, then if on one side current is 1 and voltage is 1, then on the other current will be 0.5 and voltage 2, which means that impedance increases 4x. in EFHW, it’s 1:7 winding ratio and impedance ratio is 49x, which works for end-feeding a half-wave dipole, just as expected (from 50 ohm to ~2500 ohm). that transformer is a limitation on power usable in this antenna and main reason to use this type of antenna is mechanical

          most importantly, transformers work nicely only if you have real impedances, so your antenna has to be resonant anyway. l- or pi-network tuner will also handle complex impedances so doublet or random wire will work nicely with it, as long as you can accept weight and losses in tuner

      • fullsquare@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        if you have an antenna with impedance of, say, 200 ohms, then you need to match it to transmitter impedance of 50 ohms, or else most of power output from transmitter would be bounced back and will damage output stage of amplifier. because on receive currents are tiny, you can wing it by just using it without any match and connecting it directly