Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agoHee Hee Ho Ho Ha Halemmy.imagisphe.reimagemessage-square108linkfedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down13
arrow-up15arrow-down1imageHee Hee Ho Ho Ha Halemmy.imagisphe.reChippys_mittens@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square108linkfedilink
minus-square|IlI|lIIl|IlIll|Il|IllI|@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agodeleted by creator
minus-squarenull@piefed.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·1 month agoSo it’s either a published, peer reviewed paper, or this chaotic dump of slop? Those are really the only 2 things you can imagine?
minus-square|IlI|lIIl|IlIll|Il|IllI|@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agodeleted by creator
minus-squarenull@piefed.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·edit-21 month agoAgain, neither of their credentials (or hackery) have anything to do with whether or not Hasan shocked his dog. Like I said, your focus on this is deflection. Or since you want to use debate terms “appeal to authority fallacy”
deleted by creator
So it’s either a published, peer reviewed paper, or this chaotic dump of slop?
Those are really the only 2 things you can imagine?
deleted by creator
Again, neither of their credentials (or hackery) have anything to do with whether or not Hasan shocked his dog.
Like I said, your focus on this is deflection. Or since you want to use debate terms “appeal to authority fallacy”