This is the plaque for the presidential portrait gallery for Joe Biden.

    • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      There should be a three century minimum for being a country. Otherwise you’re just a mature settler colony.

      • JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Sounds good. Because USA is not going to last 3 centuries. They are imploding before our very eyes.

        1776 1876 1976 2076

        Think they’ll last 50 more years? Trump is single-handedly causing its collapse.

      • Soulg@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        No, we were. If you’re going to pull that shit then basically no country has ever been a real country

        • DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I mean, the 90s were kind of nice in the USA. There was a real optimism for the future. We were gonna solve racism, we were gonna democratize information, we were going to judge everyone on the content of their character. Technology was always going to improve. We were gonna cure cancer, for God’s sake.

          Then Social Media happened in the 2000s. So much for that…

          • Doomsider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            That was some good propaganda in the 90’s. Now we are stuck with windmills cause cancer and woke ruined our country.

        • flandish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          laughs in anarchist… yes. no country has ever been. all jokes aside, when was america good for you, at the same time time it’s been good for everyone?

          • tetris11@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Laughs in literalist:
            “There was a point in recent history that a significant portion of the population, with enough sampling from ethnic subgroups, had decent opportunity to eke out a comfortable living. Those days that burn fresh in memory, are seemingly gone.”

            • flandish@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              so there’s a line that’s defines “significant?”

              because yeah. 40 years ago houses were affordable. but govs were still fire bombing city blocks in philly because some brown people upset them.

              • tetris11@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                Really bad, but the difference is the volume and scale. US government oppressing ethnic minorities is a horrible act, but not a new one. US government deliberately oppressing a large fraction of the majority is.

                Doesn’t make it better or worse, but it is a marked shift

                • flandish@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  right. thats my point. there isn’t a scale such as a binary, thus it has never been a “good” (as in healthy) nation, in its black and white (again a binary) form.

                  i’m just trying to push a rhetoric that stops folks from pining for day bygone that were better. they have never been better, just different

                  • tetris11@feddit.uk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    contrasting two tail ends of a continuous spectrum still points to a shift, and the availability to place a wide threshold between them does imply a certain level of robustness when used as a binary classification