ickplant@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 days agoPervert cancerlemmy.imagisphe.reimagemessage-square115linkfedilinkarrow-up1363arrow-down15
arrow-up1358arrow-down1imagePervert cancerlemmy.imagisphe.reickplant@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 days agomessage-square115linkfedilink
minus-squareAscendantSquid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down2·3 days agoIt’s not the point at all, but can dogs be poor? Like, their human can be poor, but does that then apply to the dog too? Applying a financial status to a dog feels weird, it’s not like it can open a bank account.
minus-squareTm12@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 days agoMaybe dogs can’t be wealthy, but some eat/live really well.
minus-squareMinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 days agoa lot of people’s pets eat better than they do
minus-squaresp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 days agoI mean strictly speaking, yes, it is odd to describe a dog directly with human socioeconomic descriptors. But yeah, I meant it as ‘the dog is owned by a poor human’.
It’s not the point at all, but can dogs be poor? Like, their human can be poor, but does that then apply to the dog too? Applying a financial status to a dog feels weird, it’s not like it can open a bank account.
Maybe dogs can’t be wealthy, but some eat/live really well.
a lot of people’s pets eat better than they do
I mean strictly speaking, yes, it is odd to describe a dog directly with human socioeconomic descriptors.
But yeah, I meant it as ‘the dog is owned by a poor human’.