• grrgyle@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Yeah these ratings are worse than useless. Oh The Abyss 14% better than Amelie?? Fuck off, Poindexter.

    They’re completely disconnected from my own opinions and when I see then before watching a movie they just distract me by wondering what tf other were watching.

    You can’t map.reduce this shit, it’s totally subjective

    • amorpheus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      it’s totally subjective

      Yet we agree that there is such a thing as one movie being better than another, broadly speaking. It’s not something to boil down to a percentage, but you might as well show more detail when you have the data.

      Personally, I use ratings to estimate whether a movie that I’m interested in is worth my time. Especially Rotten Tomatoes is super useful for this because the critics score is basically a distilled thumbs up or down.

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        it’s totally subjective

        Yet we agree that there is such a thing as one movie being better than another

        I mean I wouldn’t say that, it’s kind of the opposite of what I was saying actually. But if reviews form a kind of aggregate metric you find useful then that’s good for you.

        Elsewhere I even talked about how frequently I disagreed with Siskel and Ebert’s thumbs ups/downs, but the text of their reviews at least showed me I would love a movie they thought was bad.