Most Americans support term limits, campaign spending caps, and Electoral College reform, but achieving these changes likely would require amending one of the world's hardest constitutions to change.
No time burn the fucking one that been used for 250 years. Fucking thing should be burned and rewritten 30 years after it’s creation exactly as Benjamin Franklin stated.
We need a constitution that wasn’t written by slave owning white rich men. Instead a new one that actually gives us a bill of rights and true freedom.
It should be allowed but I think it needs more state and local testing along with other alternatives. It’s not clear it’s the absolute best system despite being better than what we have now. Enshrining it in the constitution would be premature at this point.
Actually, “majority-rule (Condorcet) methods of ranked voting uniquely minimize the number of spoiled elections by restricting them to voting cycles, which are rare in ideologically-driven elections.”
Yeah, maybe it’s time for amending the constitution, there should be a amendment that allows ranked choice voting
No time burn the fucking one that been used for 250 years. Fucking thing should be burned and rewritten 30 years after it’s creation exactly as Benjamin Franklin stated.
We need a constitution that wasn’t written by slave owning white rich men. Instead a new one that actually gives us a bill of rights and true freedom.
It should be allowed but I think it needs more state and local testing along with other alternatives. It’s not clear it’s the absolute best system despite being better than what we have now. Enshrining it in the constitution would be premature at this point.
Actually, “majority-rule (Condorcet) methods of ranked voting uniquely minimize the number of spoiled elections by restricting them to voting cycles, which are rare in ideologically-driven elections.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow's_impossibility_theorem