Counter ask, if you’re not willing to say these people need shot, how are you not livestock? Personally, I’m willing to shoot someone, but not alone because that’s just pointless martyrdom. Actually calling it martyrdom implies a greater effect than what it would have.
And on that point, how is accusing someone being an “officer” and then trying to radicalize that singular individual, instead of encouraging them to organize within their communities not the real fedposting?
Like you guys are so scared of calling it like it is, you won’t even do it on non-corporate forums lol. And you’re calling them a coward? Naw that’s bullshit, I think you might be looking in a mirror.
These statements are meant to push someone else to do violence for you. If it makes you feel bad to be a coward, I dunno what to say. Deal with it? You are afraid of the consequences of the actions, so you want someone else to fire the first shot. That is cowardice, even if it’s self-preservation. Sorry.
Basically, what is the difference between a provocateur and a coward telling someone else to shoot? Not a lot.
No these statements are meant for someone to do violence with me. To do it together, because the only way we win is to organize and then counter their violence with our own. They need to fear us for there to be liberty again, they need to fear us because people are being disappeared and taken to Concentration Camps.
And frankly, if you don’t think its time for violence, then I encourage you to volunteer to stay in one. Prove to us that it isn’t time for violence, because the people who seem like cowards are the ones telling people “Hey, just take it, or kill yourself!”. Absolute disgrace and frankly sociopathy.
And honestly your side is the only side telling people to go it alone, and waste their life instead of working together. That’s far more dangerous, and you know it. So until you’re willing to suffer the same as those who have already suffered at the hands of our government, then your opinion is as worthless to me as it is to your oligarchic masters that see you as nothing but a sheep in their Flock.
I would partially disagree with that. I just don’t think you have enough people willing to join you yet. I’d argue that you’re better off telling people to join whatever their closest mutual aid group or even leftist militia group then trying to find people over the internet to do violence with you, especially because anyone here could be trying to push you to do crimes for multiple nefarious purposes.
For the most part, I feel like the people trying to tell people to do crimes they are not doing on here do not fundamentally have anyone’s best interests at heart. So, I’ll apologize for being antagonistic.
Friend you nailed it in the first half and then dropped it. The idea here is to create various groups through the spread of ideas, a singular leader would just be taken out and possibly replaced. The best thing that could happen is multiple spontaneous cells being grown throughout the U.S… There aren’t enough people ready, for this which is why the ideas have to spread both online and IRL, which I do in both spaces. Whether they join their local militia, or create their own from likeminded individuals is what I’ve been trying to encourage without using the word “militia” since I find many are allergic to the label thanks to right-winged chuds.
Before ideas can become group action, they must be spread through words. Those are literally the foundation for any organizing that follows. So yeah I find your kind of rhetoric far more harmful because it essentially defends the status quo, and encourages people to continue taking abuse. Abusers love it when their targets don’t fight back, and back off once they do. In fact the only way to make them understand to back off is to use their “language” against them. Feel free to ask how I know from personal experience.
Counter ask, if you’re not willing to say these people need shot, how are you not livestock? Personally, I’m willing to shoot someone, but not alone because that’s just pointless martyrdom. Actually calling it martyrdom implies a greater effect than what it would have.
And on that point, how is accusing someone being an “officer” and then trying to radicalize that singular individual, instead of encouraging them to organize within their communities not the real fedposting?
Like you guys are so scared of calling it like it is, you won’t even do it on non-corporate forums lol. And you’re calling them a coward? Naw that’s bullshit, I think you might be looking in a mirror.
These statements are meant to push someone else to do violence for you. If it makes you feel bad to be a coward, I dunno what to say. Deal with it? You are afraid of the consequences of the actions, so you want someone else to fire the first shot. That is cowardice, even if it’s self-preservation. Sorry.
Basically, what is the difference between a provocateur and a coward telling someone else to shoot? Not a lot.
No these statements are meant for someone to do violence with me. To do it together, because the only way we win is to organize and then counter their violence with our own. They need to fear us for there to be liberty again, they need to fear us because people are being disappeared and taken to Concentration Camps.
And frankly, if you don’t think its time for violence, then I encourage you to volunteer to stay in one. Prove to us that it isn’t time for violence, because the people who seem like cowards are the ones telling people “Hey, just take it, or kill yourself!”. Absolute disgrace and frankly sociopathy.
And honestly your side is the only side telling people to go it alone, and waste their life instead of working together. That’s far more dangerous, and you know it. So until you’re willing to suffer the same as those who have already suffered at the hands of our government, then your opinion is as worthless to me as it is to your oligarchic masters that see you as nothing but a sheep in their Flock.
I would partially disagree with that. I just don’t think you have enough people willing to join you yet. I’d argue that you’re better off telling people to join whatever their closest mutual aid group or even leftist militia group then trying to find people over the internet to do violence with you, especially because anyone here could be trying to push you to do crimes for multiple nefarious purposes.
For the most part, I feel like the people trying to tell people to do crimes they are not doing on here do not fundamentally have anyone’s best interests at heart. So, I’ll apologize for being antagonistic.
Friend you nailed it in the first half and then dropped it. The idea here is to create various groups through the spread of ideas, a singular leader would just be taken out and possibly replaced. The best thing that could happen is multiple spontaneous cells being grown throughout the U.S… There aren’t enough people ready, for this which is why the ideas have to spread both online and IRL, which I do in both spaces. Whether they join their local militia, or create their own from likeminded individuals is what I’ve been trying to encourage without using the word “militia” since I find many are allergic to the label thanks to right-winged chuds.
Before ideas can become group action, they must be spread through words. Those are literally the foundation for any organizing that follows. So yeah I find your kind of rhetoric far more harmful because it essentially defends the status quo, and encourages people to continue taking abuse. Abusers love it when their targets don’t fight back, and back off once they do. In fact the only way to make them understand to back off is to use their “language” against them. Feel free to ask how I know from personal experience.