PlayStation lawyers have argued that "reasonable" players aren't being deceived by Sony's small print, which says digital game purchases don't grant ownership.
I know it isn’t the law but I feel like the burden of proof that somebody has actually read and understood the terms and conditions and was of sound mind when accepting it, should be on the company. Who knows, maybe I was just about to read the full thing and went to get myself a cup of coffee, while I was gone my cat stepped on the keyboard and pressed accept. And if the company can’t prove beyond any reasonable doubt that I did in fact read, understood and accepted it, then the Terms and Conditions are effectively nulled.
Bull. Don’t infantilise people just because you don’t like licences. I too think they’re absolute bullshit, and even bigger bullshit is that they can be revoked for some bullshit reason but people need to bear consequences of their actions. Sheesh.
I know it isn’t the law but I feel like the burden of proof that somebody has actually read and understood the terms and conditions and was of sound mind when accepting it, should be on the company. Who knows, maybe I was just about to read the full thing and went to get myself a cup of coffee, while I was gone my cat stepped on the keyboard and pressed accept. And if the company can’t prove beyond any reasonable doubt that I did in fact read, understood and accepted it, then the Terms and Conditions are effectively nulled.
Bull. Don’t infantilise people just because you don’t like licences. I too think they’re absolute bullshit, and even bigger bullshit is that they can be revoked for some bullshit reason but people need to bear consequences of their actions. Sheesh.