Naturally, one cannot presume the audience is neutral by upvotes/downvotes alone; for as I said, all these down-votes may very well just be sock-puppet accounts or biased Vatniks just the same. Silly one would ever presume up/down-vote ratio is some legitimate indication of persuasion in an unverifiable audience pool. “Cartoonish,” as you say, really.
But <Bzzzzzt> I’m sorry but your final chance has been… D-D-DENIED.
Alright, after seeing this piss -poor attempt of yours to write anything of substance, dont bother replying to my other comment, you’re clearly incapable.
Had no intention to rehash this cognitive dissonance that has long been debunked. After all, capability is not the issue; it’s getting past the fundamentalist zealotry that clouds better judgement.
It didn’t. Let’s pretend you didn’t know and make a blind assumption. I’ll admit playful condescension; but not the sexism. After all I’m not maga. I’m no fan of lies either.
What? You went there. Sexism bad when I allegedly do it, but ableism is okay when you do it? You dragged us both here.
But maybe we can find agreement by going back to simple:
I really don’t understand why you prefer this to actual conversation. You seem to care so much until the very moment anyone engages and then youre just… A puddle of clichéed disappointments
Naturally, one cannot presume the audience is neutral by upvotes/downvotes alone; for as I said, all these down-votes may very well just be sock-puppet accounts or biased Vatniks just the same. Silly one would ever presume up/down-vote ratio is some legitimate indication of persuasion in an unverifiable audience pool. “Cartoonish,” as you say, really.
But <Bzzzzzt> I’m sorry but your final chance has been… D-D-DENIED.
Alright, after seeing this piss -poor attempt of yours to write anything of substance, dont bother replying to my other comment, you’re clearly incapable.
Oh don’t worry, sweetheart.
Had no intention to rehash this cognitive dissonance that has long been debunked. After all, capability is not the issue; it’s getting past the fundamentalist zealotry that clouds better judgement.
I don’t appreciate the sexist condecention
Well, I’m glad you’ve at least managed to gain some introspection
What, a male can’t be a sweetheart? Now that’s sexist.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/sweetheart
Condescension*, by the way.
You engaged in ableism, calling me “incapable” earlier. Yikes!
Sure, lets pretend you didnt mean it with that connotation.
Right… So is this really the level of conversation where you feel the most comfortable? Must be, since you insist to drag it down to here.
It didn’t. Let’s pretend you didn’t know and make a blind assumption. I’ll admit playful condescension; but not the sexism. After all I’m not maga. I’m no fan of lies either.
What? You went there. Sexism bad when I allegedly do it, but ableism is okay when you do it? You dragged us both here.
But maybe we can find agreement by going back to simple:
Agreed?
I really don’t understand why you prefer this to actual conversation. You seem to care so much until the very moment anyone engages and then youre just… A puddle of clichéed disappointments
I truly thought this would be us coming to a mutual agreement for once! I didn’t think saying “Agreed!” to that would be all that difficult!
Alas, I see you’re banned so until next account… ?
In the meantime:
Edit: If this is at all controversial for you, then know you’re an authoritarian bootlicker.
The utter lack of any upvotes means you have no supporters here. Simple as that.