lemmy.imagisphe.re
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Tony Bark@pawb.social to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 hours ago

Chinese press allowed in White House today but not MS NOW, CNN and Politico

www.ms.now

external-link
message-square
62
link
fedilink
383
external-link

Chinese press allowed in White House today but not MS NOW, CNN and Politico

www.ms.now

Tony Bark@pawb.social to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 hours ago
message-square
62
link
fedilink
Chinese press allowed in White House today but not MS NOW, CNN and Politico: WH Journalist
www.ms.now
external-link
Overnight, D.C. District Court Judge Tim Kelly issued an order requiring the Trump administration to immediately reinstate MS NOW, CNN, and Politico’s White House access. But, this morning, MS NOW White House reporter Laura Barrón-López was denied access. She shares her experience. Former U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade and New York Times Chief White House Correspondent Peter Baker also join Erielle Reshef to discuss the judge’s order.
  • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Xi about to infiltrate the entire US without lifting a finger. Dude just stuns Trump on sight because Trump’s brain is just sex mush.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Trump fucked up so bad wirh Iran and he is hoping China oil can lower prices. If he can lower gas prices before midterms, maybe he can the epstein files secret a little longer.

      • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        10 hours ago

        This seems really odd.

        Since Trump started the Canadian Tariff Wars, the amount of Canadian crude going to the US has dropped substantially. Guess where it’s going instead? China.

        While China might sell to the US for less than they’re buying from Canada, it won’t stay that way for long. Just long enough to get the US hooked on Chinese oil, which will likely be sourced in Canada and refined in China before being sold to the US.

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          This says our pipeline exports are up from 2025.

          https://www.cer-rec.gc.ca/en/data-analysis/energy-commodities/crude-oil-petroleum-products/statistics/crude-oil-export-summary/index.html

          This says while there’s a slight drop from 2024, 2025 exports to the US are still higher than 2023.

          https://www.capp.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Canadian-Exports-of-Crude-Oil-and-Natural-Gas-January-23-2026.pdf

          • Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            There is this article which links to some reports. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/canada-china-trade-export-up-2026-9.7340408

            Total crude petroleum exports to China more than doubled to C$5.96 billion

            The links in your reply say the value of crude exported in 2014 was $153 billion. So, a very small amount.

            As I understand, the desire to get crude to the coast for shipping to Asia is the justification for the pipeline projects.

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I thought their overall use fell in 2026 as well.

          • No1@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            One pod I saw (reliability unknowable) said their imports from the middle east had gone down, but their wasn’t clear visibility on actual usage. It could have been offset by using some of their huge reserves, or doing deals with Russia and/or Iran that weren’t being disclosed.

            But China aren’t stupid and have been building out renewables to move towards less dependency on external energy supplies.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Isn’t China a net importer of oil?

        • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Yes. Massively so. I hear people say things like “Chinese oil” and it doesn’t make any sense to me. There is virtually no Chinese oil. There is Chinese financing, and there is Chinese refining services.

        • Furbag@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          They import crude oil and export refined oil.

        • 3abas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          8 hours ago

          The largest net importer of oil. Not only do they consume so much, they also have the largest strategic reserve of crude. They’ve been tapping it since the Epstein-Iran war limited their access to Iran oil and prices went up.

          They have massive refining capacity and they export refined fuel.

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@lemmy.world

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.35K users / day
  • 5.37K users / week
  • 9.34K users / month
  • 17.7K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 31.2K subscribers
  • 5.61K Posts
  • 88.9K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
  • aidan@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
  • JuBe@lemmy.world
  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.13
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org