• Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    So many people think that when Trump leaves his mortal boil things will “get better”.

    But actually, what are the odds that the next sellout-in-chief will be as stupid as Trump? We’re just getting started

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 day ago

      I have to say Trump is a fairly unique distillation of every aspect of American society that Americans don’t like to admit they have. He has plenty of vain, self-serving sycophants under him that could take his place, but I will say there are very few who have the same mix of incompetence, shamelessness and charisma draw for a certain populace.

      • bstix@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        21 hours ago

        It will be difficult for someone else to do, because Trump also didn’t actually do anything himself to become the representative of the idiots. Remembering how surprised he was to win in 2016, it only happened because the idiots didn’t want to vote for a woman. He basically tripped and fell into the role.

        It’s difficult to tell if the MAGA crowd will silently retreat to not voting again, or if they’ll agree on some random celebrity again, but I don’t think anyone can put themselves in that kind of position of representing people who hates having a representative at all.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      People underestimate the influence a single person can have on history. Without Hitler, there would have been no Nazi Germany. Without Trump, the Nazi movement in the US will fall apart. They’re certainly not going away but without a Führer they’ll just be a bunch of bickering factions. And none of the other fuckers will be able to rally their base the way Trump did.

      • LwL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        18 hours ago

        There might very well still have been something else bad. The discontent was there, if hitler hadn’t been the one to utilize it, it could’ve been someone else. Same with trump. There’s still a good chance that whoever would win the power struggle if the orange suddenly croaked had none of the apparent charisma of trump (not that I think he has any but it clearly works on a lot of people). Fascism is a personality cult, and just replacing that isn’t a given, but the initial rise heavily selects for someone who is able to create one. So if not them, it’d likely have been someone else maybe a little later.

        • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Germany might have ended up with some different form of fascism without Hitler. But I doubt things would have turned out quite as badly. Which is pure speculation, of course. Also, there may be another fascist leader after Trump. But again, I doubt he’ll have the same kind of following.

          • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Yeah, the Nazis would have won if not for the brave sabotage effort of Hitler, who also killed the man leading the Nazis!

            What a hero.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      A lot of folks don’t really think about it. A man could be gone, but his ideas and legacy will live on. We are short term thinking and instinctive animals prone to collective suicide.