An Appeals Court panel has ruled that federal agents can legally search through travelers’ cell phones without reasonable suspicion, probable cause, or a warrant when they cross an international border.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    19 hours ago

    What’s to stop you from factory re-setting your phone when you approach the border? You can sync it back up once you’ve cleared security.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Nothing. That’s standard procedure for anyone carrying anything remotely sensitive.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        It’s different if you’ve done it before you got to customs. The person who is being sued now did it after his phone was already in possession of customs.

      • Badabinski@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I imagine that you’re fine if you do it before ever approaching the border. You could just say “my phone was giving me major problems so I had to factory reset it, and I just haven’t had time to set everything back up.”

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          15 hours ago

          The lie would likely be what gets you in trouble. The basic truth would probably be safer.

          a: “Why is this phone empty?”
          b: “Because I performed a reset on it.”
          a: “Why did you perform a reset on it?”
          b: “Because I wanted to. I’m not aware of any law I broke in how I deal with my own property.”

          Your phone will likely still be seized and you may still get questioned, but you’ve broken no laws. However, don’t take my advice. IANAL

          • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I’m not aware of any law I broke in how I deal with my own property.

            “Ignorance of the [fuzzily-defined conveniently enforcement-friendly constitution-dodging illegal law that violates your rights] doesn’t exclude you from its consequences!”

      • yesman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        The law they charged that activist with requires an intentional act, i.e. giving a pig the panic code. Possession of a wiped phone can’t show destruction of evidence by itself.