• x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Where I live, gambling requires or has the following:

    • 21+
    • Casinos and online sites need to verify your identity trough your actual passport
    • No advertising allowed
    • Government supplied blacklists for problematic gamblers
    • Daily/Weekly limits
    • Very strict rules about what is allowed to be gambled on
    • Notices about getting help for gambling addiction everywhere
    • No weird fake coins. You see your actual money and gamble with your actual money.
    • All win rates should be publicly posted and verified ‘fair’ by the government
    • … etc
    • Joelk111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I thought that’s how it worked where I have the misfortune of residing, in America, but apparently the people in charge are more worried about renaming bodies of water.

      I see massive billboards on the highway advertising the casino we have nearby with straight up false claims like “the next win is just around the corner” or something and always wonder how they got away without a “TOBACCO IS CANCEROUS SMOKE AT YOUR OWN RISK” type label on their ads. It makes me so angry to see casinos literally promising wins when that isn’t how casinos fucking work and everybody with two braincells to rub together knows that.

    • baeb66@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The smartest policy I have seen for gambling was in Singapore. I think it’s S$150 per entry into the casino (or S$3000 annually) for Singaporeans to gamble. Foreign tourists don’t pay this levy. It keeps the locals out who don’t have the disposable income to gamble while bringing in money from foreigners.

      • Joelk111@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Taxes on addictions always disproportionately affect the poor. I suppose addictions and most other societal issues also disproportionately affect the poor.