Possibly linux@lemmy.zip to Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 days agoThe Pentagon is the best shape for a large buildings as long as all surrounding buildings are also Pentagonsmessage-squaremessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up130arrow-down116file-text
arrow-up114arrow-down1message-squareThe Pentagon is the best shape for a large buildings as long as all surrounding buildings are also PentagonsPossibly linux@lemmy.zip to Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 days agomessage-square24fedilinkfile-text
Who needs straight roads anyway. We would have 3 way intersections instead plus the wind would have less of a impact
minus-squareTranquilTurbulence@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 day agoWhat do you intend to do with the gaps then?
minus-square𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 day agoParks are in the middle, Roman domus style.
minus-squareTranquilTurbulence@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 day agoYeah, that should work. If you stick with the definition provided by OP, “small buildings” would be technically allowed as well. If the gasp are a problem, you could go with alternate pentagons too. Another thing about the initial conditions. OP defined that there would be only three way intersections, but that’s clearly not the case here.
What do you intend to do with the gaps then?
Room for parks!
Parks are in the middle, Roman domus style.
Yeah, that should work. If you stick with the definition provided by OP, “small buildings” would be technically allowed as well.
If the gasp are a problem, you could go with alternate pentagons too.
Another thing about the initial conditions. OP defined that there would be only three way intersections, but that’s clearly not the case here.