Worthess@discuss.online to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 2 days agoThere's a lot of freedom at first as a soldier to realize that you could put down so much evil in the world until you realize you might actually be putting evil into the world.message-squaremessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up166arrow-down143
arrow-up123arrow-down1message-squareThere's a lot of freedom at first as a soldier to realize that you could put down so much evil in the world until you realize you might actually be putting evil into the world.Worthess@discuss.online to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square32fedilink
minus-squareAnnoyed_🦀 @lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 days agoThat’s a very cynical view. Their country is their master, if they got invaded, like Ukraine do, then them fighting for their master(or country, if you will) is fighting for freedom.
minus-squareI Cast Fist@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down4·1 day agoFighting foreign enemies at home doesn’t automatically make it a “fight for freedom”. Case in point: Taliban vs USA
minus-squareAnnoyed_🦀 @lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 day ago Fighting foreign enemies at home doesn’t automatically make it a “fight for freedom”. Uhh no shit, nuance is important.
minus-squareTiger666@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 day agoYou don’t think the Taliban were fighting for their freedom? What were they fighting for then?
minus-squareI Cast Fist@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 day agoFighting for power first and foremost, but I guess you could go and say it was for the “freedom to rule”
That’s a very cynical view. Their country is their master, if they got invaded, like Ukraine do, then them fighting for their master(or country, if you will) is fighting for freedom.
Fighting foreign enemies at home doesn’t automatically make it a “fight for freedom”. Case in point: Taliban vs USA
Uhh no shit, nuance is important.
You don’t think the Taliban were fighting for their freedom?
What were they fighting for then?
Fighting for power first and foremost, but I guess you could go and say it was for the “freedom to rule”