• Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The whole trend of teens rejecting phones for dumbphones is making sense now. If you can’t fight big mainstream technology, then fuck big mainstream technology!

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 hours ago

    What is sad is that an environment like this ruins someone’s mental health and ironically increasing the overall risk of violence.

  • Kissaki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 hours ago

    “I wish that was treated as a teachable moment, not a law enforcement moment,” said Patterson.

    Seems like the Gaggle CEO has a good view. They’re still an enabler in these situations. Be it poor guidance or training. With the impact they have, taking responsibility would be tracking and ceasing contracts that do not follow this soft response approach.

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Human nature dictates we do things before we discuss if we should do things.

      To me it starts getting into a philosophical discussion but unfortunately I don’t think as a species we are mature enough yet to have these discussions.

      A good real world example of this is in Canada the separation movement by Quebec vs. Alberta. In Quebec there have been years of open public discussion before they ultimately took a vote. They were painfully away of all the nuance that came from leaving Canada. They did it right to a large extent. Compare that to Daniella Smith in Alberta and she’s hammering through the mechanisms for a vote to happen meanwhile the public has absolutely no understanding of the ramifications of if they do vote to leave Canada. They’re doing it wrong.

      Human nature by default seems to want to change the front tyre while doing 120 on the highway. This needs to change.

      • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Imagine it’s 1995 and you’re an average person. You don’t know all that much about separation, you just know that the coming referendum is about it and you don’t want to separate. You likely are not a college/university graduate and a significant amount of the people you know haven’t even graduated high school. You probably don’t have a personal computer or internet access even if you do. Your primary news source is likely the odd updates you get on the radio while driving to or from work, and you haven’t been following and aren’t familiar with how people talk about separation. You show up to vote and you get this question:

        Do you agree that Quebec should become sovereign after having made a formal offer to Canada for a new economic and political partnership within the scope of the bill respecting the future of Quebec and of the agreement signed on June 12, 1995?
        French:
        Acceptez-vous que le Québec devienne souverain, après avoir offert formellement au Canada un nouveau partenariat économique et politique, dans le cadre du projet de loi sur l’avenir du Québec et de l’entente signée le 12 juin 1995?

        What the hell are you even voting for or against here?

        The Québec referendum on separation was so confusing people remarked they didn’t actually know what they were voting for. The situation resulted in a law (Clarity Act) that forced all secession votes to pass some tests to be considered valid, and also indicated that a secession requires amendment of the Constitution of Canada, which makes it incredibly difficult to actually do.

        I really don’t want to give Québec undeserved credit on this, they handled it quite poorly tbh and the whole thing felt like it was exploiting the ignorance and anger of a minority population that had even less education and literacy than the average Canadian at the time. That said, Canada has since devolved further into being a neoliberal anglosohere shithole so perhaps they were on to something.

  • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 hours ago

    We are living in the shittiest kind of cyberpunk dystopia. Can’t wait for AI-induced cyber-psychosis once people implant Musk’s chips into their brains and give MechaHitler full access to their subconscious.

  • Aggravationstation@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I can’t say for certain because I wasn’t given one but I can’t imagine me and my friends would have been willing to communicate with each other on devices provided by our school. Even in the early 00s it would have been filled with spyware.

      • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Think it’s the same people that talk about our glorious western democratic values™️.
        You know, keeping those pesky refugees out, supporting genocide and wars.

  • 2910000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Students who think they are chatting privately among friends often do not realize they are under constant surveillance

    This is the problem

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Talking about online privacy has become the “safe sex talk” of the last decade or so. You have to keep reminding kids so that it sticks. Nothing you say online is private, it can all be copied/screengrabbed/recorded/photographed and shared by the recipient. What you say, any images you post, etc. On school or work devices they can essentially see most everything, nothing is private. Even if you make efforts to cover your tracks, a truly determined agency with enough resources likely will find out who you are if they want to.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 minutes ago

      Nothing you say online is private, it can all be copied/screengrabbed/recorded/photographed and shared by the recipient.

      Even if you fully trust the recipient, often times it can still be intercepted unless it’s end-to-end encrypted, but even then the end device can still be stolen too.

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The next few years is going to be like the time Post Office employees were hounded and had their lives destroyed over what was later found to be a software fault and not mass Human corruption, but on a far grander scale.

  • kalkulat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Lots of wannabe authoritarians out there in educationland.

    All those decades that the schools just -couldn’t afford- more (well-educated) teachers and smaller class sizes. Lots of low-end look-good.

    And then along came tech, and lo-and-behold, IT was going to be the savior. Let’s buy into that! We may not be able to teach them to read, write or think, but they can learn to kneel!

      • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Citizen! Good news! Your writings have been randomly selected by Friend Computer for review!

        A select team of Troubleshooters has been dispatched to bathe your general area in soothing Raytheon Brain Beams until your attitude improves.