Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agoHee Hee Ho Ho Ha Halemmy.imagisphe.reimagemessage-square108linkfedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down13
arrow-up15arrow-down1imageHee Hee Ho Ho Ha Halemmy.imagisphe.reChippys_mittens@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square108linkfedilink
minus-squarenull@piefed.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·1 month ago something more substantive Yeah, let me link you to 40 minutes of glaze content. That’s how we provide evidence for things, right?
minus-square|IlI|lIIl|IlIll|Il|IllI|@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agodeleted by creator
minus-squarenull@piefed.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·1 month agoTo answer your question, yes this is deflection. You linked to 40 minutes of content and went “see, proof”. Just wall after wall of text and cherry picked character references and accusations of people that have nothing to do with Hasan. All typical of a Hasan viewer though, so nice work.
minus-square|IlI|lIIl|IlIll|Il|IllI|@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agodeleted by creator
minus-squarenull@piefed.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·1 month agoSo it’s either a published, peer reviewed paper, or this chaotic dump of slop? Those are really the only 2 things you can imagine?
minus-square|IlI|lIIl|IlIll|Il|IllI|@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agodeleted by creator
minus-squarenull@piefed.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·edit-21 month agoAgain, neither of their credentials (or hackery) have anything to do with whether or not Hasan shocked his dog. Like I said, your focus on this is deflection. Or since you want to use debate terms “appeal to authority fallacy”
Yeah, let me link you to 40 minutes of glaze content. That’s how we provide evidence for things, right?
deleted by creator
To answer your question, yes this is deflection.
You linked to 40 minutes of content and went “see, proof”.
Just wall after wall of text and cherry picked character references and accusations of people that have nothing to do with Hasan.
All typical of a Hasan viewer though, so nice work.
deleted by creator
So it’s either a published, peer reviewed paper, or this chaotic dump of slop?
Those are really the only 2 things you can imagine?
deleted by creator
Again, neither of their credentials (or hackery) have anything to do with whether or not Hasan shocked his dog.
Like I said, your focus on this is deflection. Or since you want to use debate terms “appeal to authority fallacy”