I’d be upset, too. It shouldn’t be a hotel, it should be a park. A hotel in this pretty neighborhood would be awful. Especially since it’s probably going to be Millennial Beige
Yeah but a hotel is still better than a parking lot. It’s literally the worst land use possible.
Can’t do handbrake turns in the snow on a hotel
Not with that attitude.
I like your energy
What about a compromise: A trailer park. Private equity still gets to lease out the land to tenants, who own their own trailer and rent them out to Air BNB guests. It’s win-win-win.
I’d make a Trailer Park Boys joke but I’m having a hard time enjoying it anymore
Got you dawg
“They could pay them $20 to fuck off”
A hotel would destroy the view from those units along the left, as well as the church. They can see for quite a ways now, after the hotel, they’ll be staring at a hotel. Why does this hotel get to bring down the living quality of those around it, with no compensation? Will rents in those units decrease because they are going be much less desirable when they are right up against a hotel with transient guests every day?
If you don’t want to see other people or buildings, move to a cabin in the woods. Why should the people living in those units get to reap the profits of housing scarcity? Why should the people living in those units get to reap the benefits of living in a developed place developed with taxpayer money while disallowing others to do their same?
There’s totally compensation. They give the local arts place a bunch of money and host local art. (Which they can pay to get out of.) And they also have to let people use the roof for a whole 20 hours a week! (Which they can pay to get out of.)
Hey I’ve parked there
And how was it? Worth demonstrating for in front of city council? I imagine someone switching off their car, closing their eyes and just soaking in the sweet satisfaction of having parked there.
I feel like this post and highlighted quote requires more context. The parking lot is next to a church, most of the voices of dissent in the article are from people who go to that church and someone involved with another hotel being constructed not far away. The City Council voted 7-1 to approve the replacement of the parking lot with a hotel. Councilmember Nicole Speer, the one quoted above, is a member of the church who voted IN FAVOR of removing the parking lot.
In other words, it’s even worse because they would mostly only be parking there on Sunday anyway.
Frankly, church people can be the worst, most entitled assholes about this sort of thing. I remember a cycle track got removed in my city because, even though the bollards had been removed and the church-goers had already been allowed to park on top of it on Sundays, they still weren’t fucking satisfied!
Good point. If that’s the main issue, a hotel will a parking garage could have a much higher capacity for cars and offer parking passes for the Church. I’d rather see low-income housing or a park, but it’s not my town.
A fuckcars sub is arguing against removal of a parking lot?
The sale would be to build a hotel. It’s not like hotels reduce the amount of vehicles people are driving.
It’s potentially worse than the parking lot.
Where should they put the hotel then? In the middle of nowhere so people have to drive there?
Who says they need a hotel. Might as well ask where they would put the used car dealership.
Yeah, nobody ever goes to Boulder CO, anyone dumb enough to visit their kid at UC can easilly sleep in their… car…
The sacret parking lot
The Ford is my shepherd. I shall not want.
“That they gathered themselves together, to fight with Joshua and with Israel, with one Accord.”
