Then, you hypocritically provide gish-gallop as a cover for your false compassion to Quebec and France. The Donhass region was embroiled in a civil war against Kiev for 8 years before Russia joined the Ukrainian Civil War, escalating it to the Russo-Ukrainian War. Quebec is not at war with Toronto, nor did Toronto have a coup where Quebec’s supported president was ousted. Israeli-Ukrainian millitary cooperation is also well-documented. This explains your insistence that Netanyahu is the only problem, and that Israel itself as a settler-colony that only exists on genocide is fine as an entity if it had a more progressive Zionist government.
Look, you replied to me when I was commenting to another more rational user. Your methods of persuasion are failing miserably. Please, change strategies. Last chance, buddy!
(Moreover, if any neutral reader to this thread has questions or inquiries, please let me know! I will gleefully engage in good faith with anyone who isn’t spouting Pro-Kremlin autocratic propaganda).
No idea what you’re referring to, considering you only have downvotes in this thread and 0 upvotes. Demonstrably, my persuasion has been more effective, considering I have cited every major claim I’ve made, while you’ve dodged every single argument I’ve presented.
Naturally, one cannot presume the audience is neutral by upvotes/downvotes alone; for as I said, all these down-votes may very well just be sock-puppet accounts or biased Vatniks just the same. Silly one would ever presume up/down-vote ratio is some legitimate indication of persuasion in an unverifiable audience pool. “Cartoonish,” as you say, really.
But <Bzzzzzt> I’m sorry but your final chance has been… D-D-DENIED.
Alright, after seeing this piss -poor attempt of yours to write anything of substance, dont bother replying to my other comment, you’re clearly incapable.
Had no intention to rehash this cognitive dissonance that has long been debunked. After all, capability is not the issue; it’s getting past the fundamentalist zealotry that clouds better judgement.
You highlighted no fallacies whatsoever, nor have you provided any evidence for any of your claims thus far. Instead, you repeat hasbara, considering that the UN understands that no independent investigations verified sexual assault was weaponized on October 7the. Israel is a genocidal settler-colony, it isn’t a state that can continue to exist. Anyone living in Israel has a duty to oppose the state of Israel and liberate Palestine.
Then, you hypocritically provide gish-gallop as a cover for your false compassion to Quebec and France. The Donhass region was embroiled in a civil war against Kiev for 8 years before Russia joined the Ukrainian Civil War, escalating it to the Russo-Ukrainian War. Quebec is not at war with Toronto, nor did Toronto have a coup where Quebec’s supported president was ousted. Israeli-Ukrainian millitary cooperation is also well-documented. This explains your insistence that Netanyahu is the only problem, and that Israel itself as a settler-colony that only exists on genocide is fine as an entity if it had a more progressive Zionist government.
Look, you replied to me when I was commenting to another more rational user. Your methods of persuasion are failing miserably. Please, change strategies. Last chance, buddy!
(Moreover, if any neutral reader to this thread has questions or inquiries, please let me know! I will gleefully engage in good faith with anyone who isn’t spouting Pro-Kremlin autocratic propaganda).
For fun, I’ll dismantle one:
UN: “Reasonable Grounds to Believe Conflict-Related Sexual Violence Occurred in Israel During 7 October Attacks, Senior UN Official Tells Security Council”
Slava Ukraini
Free Palestine
Can’t be for one without the other, lest one is a hypocrite.
No idea what you’re referring to, considering you only have downvotes in this thread and 0 upvotes. Demonstrably, my persuasion has been more effective, considering I have cited every major claim I’ve made, while you’ve dodged every single argument I’ve presented.
Naturally, one cannot presume the audience is neutral by upvotes/downvotes alone; for as I said, all these down-votes may very well just be sock-puppet accounts or biased Vatniks just the same. Silly one would ever presume up/down-vote ratio is some legitimate indication of persuasion in an unverifiable audience pool. “Cartoonish,” as you say, really.
But <Bzzzzzt> I’m sorry but your final chance has been… D-D-DENIED.
Alright, after seeing this piss -poor attempt of yours to write anything of substance, dont bother replying to my other comment, you’re clearly incapable.
Oh don’t worry, sweetheart.
Had no intention to rehash this cognitive dissonance that has long been debunked. After all, capability is not the issue; it’s getting past the fundamentalist zealotry that clouds better judgement.
I don’t appreciate the sexist condecention
Well, I’m glad you’ve at least managed to gain some introspection
What, a male can’t be a sweetheart? Now that’s sexist.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/sweetheart
Condescension*, by the way.
You engaged in ableism, calling me “incapable” earlier. Yikes!
Sure, lets pretend you didnt mean it with that connotation.
Right… So is this really the level of conversation where you feel the most comfortable? Must be, since you insist to drag it down to here.
The utter lack of any upvotes means you have no supporters here. Simple as that.