In a thousand years from now, I honestly think 100PB is small for a thumb drive. I’ve seen such drastic increase in storage density in my lifetime that, while I don’t expect it, I wouldn’t be surprised if I see 100PB in single storage devices at some point in my lifetime.
I’m already dealing with PB-sized storage clusters at work, so the need for that k8nd of storage is already there, and necessity drives innovation.
Sure! Here’s a 100PB thumb drive.
*isolinear data crystal.
Hopefully the usb standard hasn’t updated too much.
USB-C PDcl2-𝕪ℙⓔʞɔɒds̷̬͑̉́̍̇̀̑̈́̇͊̄̊̑p̵̛̭̗̓̓̽̈́̿͋̂́̈́̎̔̔̋̓͑͜ä̸͚̥̼̼́͑̊̾̅̈́̌̈̎͡͝͡c̸͈͍͈͖̾͌̂̊̀͒͂̀̍́͝ḛ̵̪͔̭͖͔̯̑̔̓͗͜͝ͅ
Version 2.0 or 2.1?
Version 2.0.1a7-RC4
Its now been renamed to 2.3.1a7-RC4 and 2.3.1a7-RC4 has been renamed to 2.3.2a7-RC4
If its USBC its probably still backwards compatible.
Buger looking glob of DNA
In a thousand years from now, I honestly think 100PB is small for a thumb drive. I’ve seen such drastic increase in storage density in my lifetime that, while I don’t expect it, I wouldn’t be surprised if I see 100PB in single storage devices at some point in my lifetime.
I’m already dealing with PB-sized storage clusters at work, so the need for that k8nd of storage is already there, and necessity drives innovation.