This is AFTER debloating all the MS bs as much as I can.

The amount of MS telemetry is just mindboggling.

  • Ciryamo@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    306
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    While telemetry is bad the problem here is probably that this windows service pings the server but doesn’t get a response because it got stuck in your pihole. So it tries to pings again and again and again and again…

      • cheery_coffee@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is that user unfriendly? In the desired path where the resource isn’t blocked the options are display an error or try again.

        When a request goes to PiHole it just gets redirected to a bad address, so the application hasn’t got any idea why it isn’t working. In most cases a programmer just adds a retry with exponential back off and goes on with their work, because there’s no real cost to doing that for analytics or advertising code.

    • Knocturnal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The best solution would be to disable telemetry to the capacity you are capable or is possible without breaking something and block pings as backup to when it’s enabled again with updates and repeat.

      • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure but if they’re trying to send new requests while the others are still retrying, then it will result in the same thing

  • MooseBoys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    170
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    As someone who has designed and used telemetry systems, I’ll never quite understand the strong aversion some people have to them. Telemetry is what lets me tell my boss “yes people really do use our software this way and we can’t break it” or “90% of crashes happen right after the player uses a grenade”. And despite what some conspiracy theorists would have you believe, telemetry data for software from reputable companies does not get sold or used for marketing purposes. Our lawyers make sure of it, and also make us go through privacy reviews to make sure that data isn’t leaking PII.

    • Pankkake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      122
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      To me, telemetry would be like a sofa company wanting to put some cameras in your home to see if you’re using the sofa the way they thought you would. It just feels… off.

      “90% of crashes happen right after the player uses a grenade”.

      Imo, a simple opt-in crash report gets the job done. Technically it is telemetry, but a crash report is more justified than a “where have you clicked” report.

      telemetry data for software from reputable companies does not get sold

      There’s just no trust in companies to not sell my data. I cannot trust Microsoft nor Google nor any other company to not sell my data, having seen the shenanigans every single company is willing to pull off to get a cent more a year.

      • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oddly the “where you clicked” report does drive decisions for updates. We (as a developer) use that information to drive UI decisions and determine which flows are more important and should be more easily available

        • Pankkake@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, and it makes sense that it would, and I’d happily give such data to developers I trust to make the programs I love better.

          However, that same click data (maybe with some how-long-have-you-looked-at-this data) can definitely be used to target ads at me, which in my book is not okay. And as I said in my comment before, it’s really difficult (at least for me) to trust companies.

    • sigswitch@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      91
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      In general I agree, but users should be able to make that decision themselves. I do not understand why you can’t turn off telemetry, when it would be trivial to offer that option and so few users would bother to use it.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        users should be able to make that decision themselves.

        Agreed

        I do not understand why you can’t turn off telemetry,

        It should be opt-in, not opt-out.

      • Chunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree, it should be opt in. Where I disagree is with how strongly people react against it.

        If you buy a car and it only comes with Bluetooth do you have a meltdown? Do you kick, scream, and cry that Big Car is going to steal your data? No that’s fucking ridiculous. But grown ass man children on Lemmy act that way when Microsoft wants to know how many gigs of ram they have.

        • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is a terrible analogy. First of all, Bluetooth isn’t sending data back to headquarters. It’s a short range wireless connection between your gadgets. It couldn’t even if it wanted to.

          Secondly, no one is kicking, screaming, and crying. You said it yourself “that’s fucking ridiculous”, and you’re right, because you just made it up to attack those you disagree with.

          Finally, would you be upset if your car sent info on where and how you drive back to Ford? Or do you consider the places you go to be your own private information? Because despite your exaggerations, that’s actually what we’re talking about here. Some people would, and some people wouldn’t. You’re obviously in the latter group. But I don’t consider what I do in my free time to be anyone’s business but my own, and I’m offended that any business thinks it’s entitled to it.

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      As a programmer: “your data is boring. I am not interested in leveraging this for anything besides getting the service you are using to work as well as possible”

      Also me as a programmer: “yo, you don’t need that data, stop asking for it. Ohh, your app is broken because it can’t access permissions? Yeet.”

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not about what the programmers want, it’s about the sales and marketing departments. They are the ones who use and abuse that data

        • Crit@links.hackliberty.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          As a UI designer, no it’s not just them. We need to know how people are using features to know if we should prioritise or deprioritise work on them and what work we might want to put in them.

          • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            We need to know how people are using features to know if we should prioritise or deprioritise work on them and what work we might want to put in them.

            So ask them to take the survey, instead of spying on them.

              • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                They’re able to autocorrect for that, in the way they present the surveys and the type of questions they are asking, they actually have trick questions to check for those kind of things.

          • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Thank you. I’ve personally not worked at a company yet that actually sold this data or moved it outside of our internal systems. It exists purely to drive business decisions

      • Wilmo Bones@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        As a programmer: “your data is boring. I am not interested in leveraging this for anything besides getting the service you are using to work as well as possible”

        Also me as a programmer: “yo, you don’t need that data, stop asking for it. Ohh, your app is broken because it can’t access permissions? Yeet.”

        It’s not about the programmers. It’s about the company and the ability to make money off of data they get from you. You should be the one who gets money for your data. Not Microsoft, not Google etc.

        Is Microsoft making money off of this particular telemetry data? Maybe not. It should always be opt-in

        • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          My company collects a ton of data, but it doesn’t leave our servers. We use it purely to drive internal decisions based on how people actually use the software

          • Nahdahar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            My problems with telemetry:

            Scope: if you provide a service which is a “wrapper” for doing other things, I do not want you to collect usage data. Example: an entire fucking operating system

            Opt-out by default (or completely unable to turn it off) even if the service or software I’m using is paid: I want to have the ability to say no. Communicate properly what you collect when I get access to the service, allow me to say no and don’t hide it in 300 pages long TOSes. I don’t want to become your free UX tester when I already pay for the service.

            Telemetry-driven development: I absolutely hate this both as a user and a developer. We see there are thousands of users using a feature, but it’s a low % in general, so lead decides we need to remove it from our product. I know that those x thousand people will be annoyed, and so am I when I’m on the receiving end of this.

            Another reason that is not universal but service specific is making decisions that purposefully keep you on the platform, over optimizing the interface for maximizing profit.

      • drathvedro@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Me, after spending an entire day making sure we don’t set any cookies until we get consent and actually need them, while fighting off managers who want to install a spyware X, Y and Z just to track the amount of sales, visiting random ass page that could’ve been entirely replaced by just an image, seeing half-page banner saying “we have already set cookies, serviceworker and all of the trackers because the internet does not work without them” be like: Fuck you, Artemiy, my site works fine even without javascript and no cookie header at all. It’s only yours that shits itself at any mention of privacy.

    • Dynamo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t want you to know anything about me or my device. Simple as

    • heyoni@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      How about shit breaking because everyone at some point is a bad programmer? Even Apple Music doesn’t work when I walk into the elevator until halfway through presumably because hitting play sets of a bunch of useless blocking network calls for music I have saved locally.

      What those calls are, I can’t say for sure. Downloading artwork, license checks or telemetry. I’d venture to guess it’s the latter since music will play with placeholder artwork on a slow connection and license checks aren’t required if the subscription was recently validated (works offline for days).

      But who really knows. I never bothered to inspect the traffic. The point is, if a company like Apple is creating such a crummy experience for a function so absurdly basic, you can imagine how easy and prevalent telemetry based user degradation is. Go browse the web with a tracker blocker and tell me it isn’t snappier.

      PS: I’m also a programmer and collect error reports. So many developers will forego using connection pools, much less collect data with async api’s.

      And let’s not even get into how telemetry is a shit tool that is misused 99.99% of the time and only used to surface popular features that aren’t necessarily good features only because we attach causation to every metric (x feature is highly used, therefore it must be good).

    • corship@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      So why not ask, “hey you want to share some telemetry to help us improve the product” then?

      It’s what all reputable companies or projects, I am aware of, do.

      • MooseBoys@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, but maybe “reputable” isn’t the right word. Realistically, it’s anyone who would potentially face billions in a class-action lawsuit and could actually afford to pay up without going bankrupt. It’s just not worth the risk to getting a few extra $million to pull in telemetry data to the already expansive list of marketing data they collect and monetize.

        For example, I would doubt that Hearthstone (Blizzard, revenue $8.7B) sells their app telemetry data. But I could definitely believe that Hill Climb Racer (Fingersoft, revenue $30M) does, or at least integrates it with ad targeting products.

      • Chunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Microsoft has more to lose than almost any other tech company. They also have more process, legal enforcement, and bureaucracy than most other tech companies.

        There’s no fear of a lone engineer moving fast and breaking things at Microsoft. If someone at Microsoft had an idea for how they’d use your data they’d have to pass it through 5 chains of command, 2 tech orgs, and Legal just to begin the process.

    • iegod@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      A few things (and I enable it usually, for the record):

      • Not really the user’s job to help you with anything especially related to your boss
      • “from reputable companies does not get sold or used for marketing purposes. Our lawyers make sure of it,” fuck man, this made me laugh. Good one

      Policies get updated, companies are bought and sold, laws change, and most crucially of all, data gets leaked. It doesn’t matter how airtight your asshole is puckered up or how many isolated networks are involved. It gets leaked. Leave the decision up to users about it and in particular maybe let them have full control of their networks.

      • MooseBoys@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t matter how airtight your asshole is puckered up or how many isolated networks are involved. It gets leaked.

        That’s why our lawyers make us make sure that data is sufficiently anonymized before it’s even put on the wire.

    • MrSilkworm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      That would be good, considered the user could actually have a choose to opt out the telemetry. Windows don’t ask you about gathering data for telemetry or “other” reasons.

      • Chunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Except this isn’t 1982 and that computer is running Windows 11, not Multix. The CPU probably has at least 8 cores and the NIC can do at least a gigabit. A network retry is not going to matter.

  • IronpigsWizard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The future:

    “Malwarebytes has flagged your entire operating system as potential malware”

    Lol… :/

        • uncreativechap@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          First time I’ve heard someone say Malwarebytes sucks. Is this more of a “Recent update makes it bad” thing or “The company behind this software is horrible”? Personally I’ve never had a problem with them.

          • Gabu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The company behind the software has always been a piece of shit, but their detection rate (true positives) is really good.

              • Gabu@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                They don’t give a damn about privacy, if I’m not mistaken were once caught distributing “fake” malware to test their software, and had an episode where their database got invaded and they didn’t even bother with a simple “sorry about that”. Also, their service model has some stinky dark design patterns.

  • corship@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well blocking these calls obviously inflates the numbers due to retries.

    • Dremor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can concur. MS do not know the concept of retry limitation.

      You can even know when I’m working from home just to the number of blocked MS tracking calls in my pihole log 🤣

  • kd45@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Devil’s advocate: basically the only proper way to figure out how people are using your product and how you can tweak it to achieve its goal is by firing events and including relevant metadata such as how much time they spent on a screen or how far they scrolled. Telemetry is not necessarily “evil” by default.

    • CeeBee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      The other side of that is that the telemetry data never gives you a “why” of something.

      For example, users might spend a long time at a screen because they are thinking about what to do, or they are confused by the options and can’t figure out which option they need.

      This is why a QA team coupled with a large amount of beta testers is invaluable and necessary.

      Telemetry, in the context of software development and UX design, is either a decision by the misinformed or just an excuse to save costs by axing the Windows QA department.

      In reality it’s likely the data is being sold off. But in either case, that’s data Microsoft isn’t entitled to (from a moral/privacy perspective).

      • pirat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        For example, users might spend a long time at a screen because they are thinking about

        … anything!

        what am I gonna eat?

        I should remember to feed the bicycle…

        who stole my cat btw?

        who am I to judge?

        who am I?

        what’s the meaning of life?

        what’s the meaning of finding it?

        what’s the meaning of figuring out what the meaning is of finding it???

      • heyoni@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I replied elsewhere but YES! Telemetry is notorious for causing devs to hyperfocus on shit features due to their high usage. Just because a user is clicking X over Y doesn’t mean Y sucks and X is better. Maybe Y is in their periphery, or camouflaged by the background artwork or worded badly. But hey, since X gets a lot of clicks, it must be good, right?

      • Chunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Telemetry, in the context of software development and UX design, is either a decision by the misinformed or just an excuse to save costs by axing the Windows QA department.

        That’s very silly. That’s actually such a ridiculous opinion I’m pretty sure you’ve left out some assumption that would make it make sense.

        • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Telemetry is useful, but there is no accountability on how it’s being used, so ultimately it could be used in bad faith and the average user wouldn’t ever know.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The other side of that is that the telemetry data never gives you a “why” of something.

        Focus groups and customer surveys work really well for knowing the “why” of something

    • JustARegularNerd@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      I totally agree, but where I have a problem (and I imagine a lot of other users here) is that you can’t fully opt out. You can only set “minimal” tracking but not none.

    • Polar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, Firefox, lemmys beloved browser, sends telemetry by default. You have to dig through menus you didn’t know existed to even find out, and then disable.

      Not only to Mozilla, but third parties as well.

      • Matthew@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure it’s scummy, but it’s definitely not hidden. When you open the settings page Data Collection is a top level option

        • Polar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s hidden in the fact it’s not presented upon first startup, it never mentions it, and it’s at the very bottom of the settings page.

          You have to discover it. And who knows how long you had it enabled before you find it.

          • idyllic_optimism@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s interesting. I always get a pop-up asking about opting in for sending telemetry when installing Firefox. It was never hidden or the option selected for me. I opt out and it stays opted out.

      • Chickenstalker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Firefox is the lesser of two evils. It turned to shit the moment they took Google’s poisoned money. The money also made the Mozilla org put on airs and think they’re some world-changing UN body or some shit and lose focus on their core business of making web browsers.

      • LogarithmicCamel@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not sure about this. When I installed Firefox, it asked me if I allowed it to collect data and run studies (I answered yes). Also, as far as I remember, I never changed the Marketing Data setting and it was off.

    • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Devil’s advocate: basically the only proper way to figure out how people are using your product

      Focus groups and customer surveys work really well.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Actually, except for the deepest debugging data that only a programmer would want, you’re incorrect. And the conversation wasn’t just about that one minority type of data set.

            • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Once again, no.

              All that information is important for the dev itself sure, but also for the UI people, the UX, the product manager, etc.

              I mean, I just retired from a career as a self-employed incorporated UI/UX software developer for Fortune 100 companies, but what the fuck do I know, right?

              The data telemetry that you are describing is data overload and ends up being not efficient to know. The truth gets lost in the quantity noise.

              You have to study the usage patterns of how people use the software, by actually watching people use the app, and you don’t get that from just some counter in memory counting how many times a certain button was pressed, there’s no gestalt in that data set. Great data for selling to third parties, but not for helping you with the UX of an app.

              It’s my professional advice that I feel confident in the opinion I expressed on this matter, learned from literal experience on the ground.

                • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It’s my professional opinion, as a current software engineer that what I said is my reality.

                  Are you an expert on the subject being discussed?

                  I am.

                  Also, there’s just one reality.

                  If your telemetry was useless, it’s because it was poorly done,

                  How, exactly, can telemetry be collected poorly?

                  You totally ignore my points of collecting that much data becomes ineffective and becomes ‘white noise’, as well as how that data would benefit resale more than it would UX analysis.

                  what can I say?

                  You could just move on, Internet Warrior.

                  You’re trying to tell an expert on the subject we’re discussing that they’re wrong about something that they’re telling you they’re very sure of, from many years of experience.

      • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not in the slightest unfortunately. Often customers don’t even know what customers want, and the subgroup that actually responds to these aren’t necessarily “average”

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not in the slightest unfortunately. Often customers don’t even know what customers want, and the subgroup that actually responds to these aren’t necessarily “average”

          That seems like one hell of a hand waving away the opinion.

          You do realize that was used for decades before computer’s and the Internet was a thing, right?

          And they do things like blind tests so they get audiences that are average.

  • static09@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Something is seriously wrong with your Windows 11 install. I have two Windows 11 devices on my network and a Surface Duo 2.

    • radix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Conviva is “video streaming analytics.” Any site with video content is trying to track who uses it, how long they watch, etc.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It freaks me out that it’s sending what users are watching in real time, that’s exactly Spyware.

        • AssPennies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          I read about some smart tvs computing a hash of what’s on screen to phone home about, in attempt with figuring out what content a user is watching when that content is 3rd party controlled.

          We need some privacy laws up in this mother fucker.

    • HidingCat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wow, do you have a lot of Amazon devices? That’s a lot of calls to Amazon.

      Where are the Conviva calls coming from?

          • static09@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            This would be correct. We have at least 7 amazon alexa/fireTV devices and a bunch of other IoT devices with Alexa capability and each of them get used regularly.

            The IoT devices are on their own subnet which doesn’t have access to the other subnets. I live with my mom and Alexa devices just make her life way easier. I put in the work to make sure the alexa and IoT devices are as restricted as possible without losing functionality so she can live a bit easier.

    • Praise Idleness@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah I figured. I can’t(don’t have the will power to) point out the reason for this extremely unusual behavior. I just let it be because no devices are visibly suffering from it though.

  • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    It has become really nasty for sure…

    But I can’t really blame them. Who wouldn’t want to know? And who doesn’t do it? It’s just always MS who gets shit on for doing it. Everything and everyone tracks our every movement and click. If ET had been an android-phone he had been long called home before the intro started.

    Don’t get me wrong, i effing abhor these things from the depths of my nerdy heart and do everything to block them all. But we just can’t avoid it anymore. We can just hope to get it all blocked or that it at least only sends anonymous usage-data and nothing else.

    • kava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      And who doesn’t do it?

      OSS operating systems. The more proprietary software you run, the less and less you actually own your computer and the more it becomes a tool to advance the interests of megacorps.

      • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not all. Ubuntu does phone home too. But sure, most don’t. But OSS is not for mainstream-users. I am protected (and just pissed), i was speaking more on behalf of the clueless mass and in general.

        And btw. Your argument fails at phonee. Android and apple suck in regards to privacy. I could use privacy-os’ on my pixel but they all lack boldly. So the moment i leave my perfect private pc, I’m screwed with mobiles again… I doubt there ever will be a viable linux-phone.

          • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Last time i tested it, it was kinda just a barebone/PoC. Camera worked like shit and basically everything else too. Granted it was a long time ago. Might’ve changed by now, if that’s what you’re suggesting by that?

            But even if it’d be great, it will never touch mainstream. It’s nerd-stuff, even the work necessary to get it onto non-pixel-phones suck hairy monkeyballs.

            Not to make fun of it or anything. I love that these exist.

            • smeg@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Since the sandboxed Google Play Services were developed a year or two ago it’s been excellent, there are only one or two very Googley things (like Google Pay and Android Auto) which you can’t run without issue.

              • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                That sounds nice. Sadly i rely on android auto as my headunit has no internal navigation. Biggest downer for me was the camera. The FOSS-cams just couldn’t compete with the stupid gcam. Or only with constant fiddling and tweaking.

                Guess I’ll try it again to see. My early-adopter-experience was just very unsatisfying 😁

      • Billiam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        But to play devil’s (angel’s?) advocate for a minute, Microsoft can’t fix vulnerabilities in Windows without telemetry data. There’s a practically infinite combination of hardware components Windows runs on, and that makes it impossible for Microsoft to find and fix vulnerabilities and bugs in house. Older versions of Windows were so insecure in-part because Microsoft made telemetry reports opt-in, and we all know how likely the average user is to do so.

        Now that’s not to say that everything Microsoft collects is appropriate; I’m only saying there is a valid case for collecting some data from users.

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          1 year ago

          If they only used it for that people wouldn’t have a problem with it. The problem is due to their shit business practices no one trusts them (or should trust them). They’ve proved they don’t have their users best interests at heart.

          • kava@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            They’ve proved they don’t have their users best interests at heart.

            This is true for any for-profit business. They exist strictly to make profit for the shareholders. In fact, the executives can be held legally responsible should they not act in the best interests of the shareholders. By their very nature, no for-profit organizations will EVER have the users best interests at heart.

            • Iamdanno@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Not true for “any for-profit business”, but true for “any publicly-traded company”.

              Private corporations are beholden only to the laws of the land.

              • HidingCat@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s why all enshittification usually starts because of publicy-traded companies, or companies trying to go there. We’re mostly here because Reddit wanted to go public.

              • Welt@lazysoci.al
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                free *rein (like not holding the reins on a horse, not like a king reigns)

        • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh i didn’t mean to say that telemetry is inherently bad. If it really would just be totally anonymous stats the devs would need, yeah sure. Just tell me WHAT EXACTLY it is. Or gimme a preview-option before sending. But it’s mostly stuff that’s none of their beeswax.

          The amount my pihole blocks is titanic. If I’d be paying for traffic that would make a substantial difference.

          • Billiam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh no worries- I didn’t think you were. Just so many people jump on the “ALL DATA COLLECTION IS SPYING!” bandwagon they don’t realize there can be a perfectly rational reason for doing so that doesn’t reduce down to “The Deep State is watching everything you do!”

            Besides, they do that at your telecom anyway.

            • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Lol. Yep. Unless you do vpn. As a dev myself I know the need for telemetry in ever more complex things nowadays. Without a ton of data how should you improve or fix your thing. But i would never collect data that would not be my beeswax. But i also understand how tempting it might be 😔

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Microsoft can’t fix vulnerabilities in Windows without telemetry data.

          They did so before Telemetry was a thing.

    • prunerye@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      we just can’t avoid it anymore

      Speak for yourself. Besides, all-or-nothing privacy is a false dichotomy. Giving out less personal data is still better than giving out everything, and you don’t need 100% privacy to be unprofitable to advertisers.

      • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        You misread. It IS unavoidable nowadays or most of the surface-web is non-functional if you block anything that isn’t content. Besides the amount of work it takes to just not be tracked rises and rises.

        Doesn’t mean I don’t do whatever i can do avoid it. To every techy it should be more than obvious that there is no binary approach. You can only do more or less to avoid more or less but never eliminate it.

        So yeah, the less the better. And one might even partially reach a state where one is unprofitable to advertisers. Yet that can change tomorrow or on the next site or when you use some phone-app or or or…

        That’s what i meant with “unavoidable”. You can’t avoid a persistent ever-evolving problem.

        • thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Idk what you’re talking about. I have a pi hole and use uBlock and I rarely have any issues. And, when I do, it’s not even a site that I really care about anyway.

    • GigglyBobble@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If ET had been an android-phone he had been long called home before the intro started

      That’s a good one! But to be fair, Apple calls home just as much. They just don’t sell that data (yet).

      • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        As does Android. I’m not sure why we would give MS a by for this. They’re all as bad as each other and all deserve to be blocked as comprehensively as possible.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you think they don’t use that data to try and sell apple products, I’ve got a bridge to sell.

        They may not have an advertising network, yet, but they use your data for their interests. Currently, it serves their interests to pretend they are more private and secure, but they are not.

        • GigglyBobble@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          They may not have an advertising network, yet

          That’s what I meant. Of course they use that data and don’t let it sit on their servers not knowing what to do with it…

      • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Totally. Wasn’t an apple-fanboy-comment. Apple even suck more. At least i COULD (and may!) change my pixel’s os to some privacy-focused one.

    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Desktop linux doesn’t have any of this. And one day we’ll get real linux on phones too (with full featured support).

      • GigglyBobble@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Canonical Ubuntu does or at least did though. Caused a shitstorm years ago despite it being opt-in back then. I don’t know how they do it nowadays.

        KDE also has opt-in usage tracking but I trust that project enough to believe it’s really only for improving the software.

        • verysoft@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think most software like this grows to a certain size and then they need the telemetry to identify issues. There’s so many hardware configurations and most people don’t submit bug reports or opt into their configuration being shared. It’s not an inherently bad thing, just some companies are taking more than they need.

          • GigglyBobble@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Windows telemetry started with Windows 10. Windows 7 was the most stable Windows ever and hardware configurations were just as plentiful. Sure, the data helps but it’s hardly mandatory.

      • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah, we will never have a GOOD Linux-phone. And if, it’s most likely NOT without tracking and whatnot. Why should any company put money into a thing they can’t control after sale? Sadly so, i might add.

          • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You understand that it’s not just about the software, right? Don’t you think there’s a reason there still isn’t any?

              • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Great. And the rest of the phone? And the adaption of the OS? The dev of all needed apps? And the marketing? And the legal stuff? And the tech-support? And the overall financing? And how shall it be able to compete with being OSS as its only distinctive feature?

                I’d love to have one but it won’t happen.

    • ano_ba_to@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s always MS who has people on the internet defending them when they do it, to the point that it looks like MS social media presence is being carefully managed, like Apple. I saw it happen on Reddit too, and it happened less and less the more they got called out. The same “$70 a year for Office 365 is so worth it” is a talking point when I was on Reddit. Apparently, people here say the same thing.

      • toomanyjoints69@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It really is amazing to me that lemmy suddenly has an army of anti linux shills on it. Idk what the purpose of that even is.

      • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not defending them. I just dislike the silly MS-hate train. As if they were the only ones doing it. If apple does it, it’s a feature. MS is evil. That’s as boring and old like IE-jokes that are still around. I have more Linux-machines than win-machines in my home lab.

        And every major crap has its fanboys and marketing-workforce defending their shit.

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Join us… become Linux nerd, never look back. Hate that the one or two software you use that has no viable equivalent is either super janky or doesn’t work on wine even though tons of games outperform windows… with the windows build.

    Or battle telemetry for several years until you get forced to subscribe to win 12.

    • Praise Idleness@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Only reason I use Win 11 is a single proprietary DRM software I have to deal with on a daily basis. I find almost everything more comfortable in Linux than Windows. I also don’t play games so it’s honestly painless.

        • sexual_tomato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Doesn’t matter, in the end, because it’s the same story for tons of us out there. The company I work at now makes a product that only works on Windows. It’s in most of the power plants in the country. You’ve never heard of us unless you are one of half a dozen people at each power plant. There are thousands and thousands of companies just like mine, cranking out software that only works on Windows.

          I think the only thing that will change this trend is the raspberry pi and machines like it. Make it so cheap to equip your employees with a Linux machine that it’s impossible to ignore.

          Even then, though, 10 hours of lost productivity a month makes the windows machine the more valuable buy for even a low paid employee.

          • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Doesn’t matter, in the end, because it’s the same story for tons of us out there.

            Yeah, actually, kind of does. It helps us determine if you just bsing and/or shilling, or if there’s really a product out there that does what you say, which in that case I would like to know so I can stay away from it.

            Also I do get that there’s defined vertical markets that have a small customer base of sales, and they could target a single OS in the development for the product for that vertical market, but then to use that as an example of a problem that the majority has to deal with is not intellectually honest.

            • Praise Idleness@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I live in South Korea and the software I use is a video drm software strictly only for domestic usage. It’s very intrusive software, even killing all the processes it thinks to have a screen capturing(sharing) ability(discord, teams, obs…) Circumventing these measures will also get me banned which is very bad. There is no way they’re making Linux version too. The market is stupendously small in here.

              It’s something that a lot of people have to go through here. AntiDRM/FOSS is just not a thing here at all.

              • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Wow, okay, good to know. I had no idea South Korea was that strict on DRM and such. Learned something new.

  • bless@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait till you plug in your cell phone to charge they start calling home like crazy

    • ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Get a device that is supported by degoogled android systems and get rid of all the garbage. My recommendation is always GrapheneOS on a pixel, just because you can reinstall google play services if you really need to and preserve usability, while massively boosting privacy and security.

      • Dynamo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unfortunately the majority of devices supported by degoogled android distros are straight garbage. LIke the pixel line. Best device i’ve seen would be Fairphone 3+, or Volla Phone 22

        • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you say that you must have never used one. Pixels are objectively good phones by every measure except having an SD card slot, which they don’t.

          • Dynamo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            No microsd, no jack, no dualsim. So basically noone of the features i need. You know what i don’t need from my phone? A lot of processing power. Wtf would i even use that for, “Advanced Calendar”?

            • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s fine to prefer those features, but it’s not accurate to call those phones bad. Mine came with a USB-C to 3.5mm headphone jack and USB-C to USB-A adapter and plenty of storage, so all my needs are met with it.

    • sheogorath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I used blokada on my phone and it blocked around 10k calls per day. I’ve since moved to use Mullvad as an always on VPN and turned all of the blockers on. Haven’t setup a pihole for my home yet because I didn’t have access to the router.

  • pewnit@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, I recently did it for a lab and it was… interesting.

    My Ubuntu VM wasn’t particularly great either but it was the one that my uni provided

    • sebinspace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ubuntu lost me years ago. I still use the server version for… servers. If you want something rawk sawlid for servers, go Ubuntu. Otherwise, go Pop. Or Elementary. Or Mint.

      Don’t like your hand held? Fedora.

      Hate yourself? Arch.

      Draw your entire personality from knowing what a transistor is? Gentoo.

  • EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have other ways of disabling those telemetry reports.

    O&O shutup 10 and adguard for desktop allow the user to turn off a lot of bullshit.