• batmaniam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Another fun eye/brain fact: There are two “outputs” for each eye. One goes to your occipital lobe, in the back, and really processes the image (“That’s a cup, it <holds liquid> <is firm with a medium weight>…” etc) and one goes to your brain stem, which processes movement.

    It’s possible to have the connection to the occipital lob severed, but not to the brain stem. It’s a condition called blindsight. The result is that if you showed someone a cup, they wouldn’t be “see” it; they wouldn’t know what it is and wouldn’t register you were showing them anything at all… but if you tossed it to them they could catch it.

  • village604@adultswim.fan
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    1 day ago

    Fun semi-related fact:

    Have you ever walked outside on a bright day and it’s so bright it hurts? Turns out there’s a max pain limit from brightness per eye, and your brain adds them together.

    By closing one eye, you cut the total possible pain in half.

    • IPeaceInYourFace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Anybody else close one eye when it’s too loud and they need to think?

      Now it makes sense.

      Less GPU usage by eyeballs, more capacity for prediction algorithms.

    • Jax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      Huh, I’ve always closed one eye when it’s super bright because it’s simply more comfortable. Cool to have the behavior defined this way.

      • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I never knew why the hell that worked, it seemed so bizarre and knowing it this way really is cool

    • NABDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 day ago

      Absolutely unfun semi-related fact:

      Sometimes when one eye is injured, the injured eye has to be removed or your body will decide the uninjured eye is bad and your immune system will destroy it.

      Sympathetic Ophthalmia

      If the injured eye has no chance of recovery, they scoop it out.

        • NABDad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Yeah, the immune system can be moronic. Intelligent design my ass.

          However, there’s something extra special about getting poked in one eye and having your own immune system decide that an eye for an eye means your good eye has to die.

          • cynar@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I think the immune system can’t see the eye, so it’s never trained to avoid it. If the eye is damaged, the immune system can become aware of it and start reacting. Once it starts, pulling it back is not easy.

            The immune response system is simultaneously amazing and insane.

            It basically deliberately scrambles part of the DNA in the immune cells that create antibodies. The rest of the body then sheds cells into the blood to move to the lymph nodes. Any immune cells that react then self destruct.

            It’s the equivalent of firing a paint blunderbuss at a wall, and creating a silhouette by standing in the way!

            • NABDad@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              My immune system pisses me off constantly.

              It let COVID through three times despite me rigorously keeping up to date with the vaccines as much as possible, and at the same time it has destroyed my thyroid gland and it has declared cherries and peaches as terrorist infiltrators.

              I feel like if my immune system is so bored it needs to attack harmless things, I should never have to deal with any actually harmful thing.

              It’s like a cop that beats up an unarmed teenager, but hides when someone is shooting up a school.

              • cynar@lemmy.world
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 hours ago

                I definitely think there are grounds to the cleanliness hypothesis. Basically the immune system expects a certain amount of activity. If it’s underperforming, the body systems assume it’s a problem with the immune system, not a lack of bugs, because we are too clean. It then racks up activity levels, causing problematic autoimmune or allergy reactions.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      That is fun, I’ve wondered why that is. I also think sometimes when it’s super bright out it makes me sneeze.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Is this that odd? We experience less pain if one of two arms has a knife in it instead of both.

      • SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It is a bit odd. Your eyes feel pain to tell you whatever you are seeing might damage them if you look too long. But if you close one eye the pain can disappear entirely, even though that single eyes experience is the exact same.

  • whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 day ago

    I met a person long ago that had one hemisphere “dead” after several strokes. So their vision was cut in half in a way I couldn’t really understand before I found out about this.

    So they could just see one side (left maybe) but with both eyes, like if you took a screenshot of a FPS view and completely cut off one half of the image

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      I literally just finished having a migraine aura (it’s only the second time I’ve had one, though no headache the first time and no headache yet now.) I was reading a bit about it and how it’s a caused by a slow wave going across one’s brain. It started in the middle of my vision on the drive home, and after I arrived it continued sweeping off to my left field of vision until it dissipated off into the periphery a few minutes ago.

      It’s interesting to look at this image and imagine the wave going across the back of my right brain hemisphere. It’s also interesting how even the visual looked like the cone-shaped wave that follows a sonic boom, slowly spreading out.

      And now, with such dire imagery and the potential for upcoming pain, I’m going to lie down and hope nothing else happens.

      • LetThereBeNick@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It is really cool to perceive some of the structure of your visual cortex in cases like this. Another example is watching the patterns when your eyes are closed for a while in a dark room. Those spreading waves you can sometimes see resemble the activity recorded from cortex at rest.

      • Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Wish you a speedy post-drome. I had migraines for a year in the past, and the thought of going through that again fills me with dread.

  • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 day ago

    The so-called “split brain” studies on people who have had the bridge between the two hemispheres - the corpus callosum - cut to treat grand mal seizures are fascinating. They use this method to communicate with each hemisphere separately without the other knowing.

    You can, for example, give one an instruction to do something. After it has done it, you ask the other (verbal) hemisphere why they just did that, and they immediately make up a plausible-sounding explanation despite the scientists knowing it’s not the actual reason.

    You also get different answers for questions about dream jobs and such.

    This all sparks the question: Are there two “people” in our brain the whole time or is the other created the moment the connection is cut? And which one is what I call “I”?

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      what i want to know is whether making up an explanation is universal, or if other people would just go “no clue”.
      Because if EVERYONE with a severed corpus callosum just makes up explanations that is very fucking uncomfortable to think about, and i’ll treasure having mine intact

      • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I’m no neuroscientist but I don’t think this has anything to do with the two hemispheres being separated - it’s just how the human mind works. When something happens we come up with an explanation for it that’s sometimes factual and sometimes completely made up. These people don’t know that they’re making it up - they genuinely believe the reason they’re giving. We’re not comfortable with uncertainty, especially when it comes to our own behavior.

        I’m personally one of the people who doesn’t believe in free will so these findings make perfect sense to me and are in no way in conflict with my worldview, but I get how hearing about this might make someone else uncomfortable.

    • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      2 people, that’s it? What if you are a voice machine, just voices all the way down… but you only recognize the loudest as yourself?

    • nogooduser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      You can, for example, give one an instruction to do something. After it has done it, you ask the other (verbal) hemisphere why they just did that, and they immediately make up a plausible-sounding explanation despite the scientists knowing it’s not the actual reason.

      Sounds like AI got something right then.

      • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        There’s an uncomfortable amount of similarities between how the human brain and LLMs work.

        Next word correlating with the words said before, confidently spreading false information, telling people what they want to hear… These are by no means unique to LLMs.

    • Airfried@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      You can, for example, give one an instruction to do something.

      How would you do that? Since both eyes are connected to both hemispheres isn’t it kind of hard to do that? Or are both ears separated and you can give commands through that without the other hemisphere knowing? I’ve heard about these studies too but I’m not sure about how the setup works because I’ve heard they used text on a screen for that but OP said the eyes do snitch to the other half after all. I find it a little confusing.

      • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        By building a setup that allows the researchers to flash text on the right/left visual field. On a normal brain this information does indeed travel between the hemispheres but on a split brain it doesn’t.

    • Mohamed@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Its a bit confusing to me at first. Expectation: left eye goes to right hemisphere, right eye goes to left hemisphere. Reality: left eye output goes to both hemisphere, right eye goes to both hemispheres.

  • Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    One eye per hemisphere? Are you that one Hollywood exec who insists humans only use 1% of their brain?