• unglueclass23@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I don’t think they went through with it.

      I remember reading a related article reclaimthenet

      This same Home Office served Apple with a secret order, a Technical Capability Notice, demanding a backdoor into end-to-end encrypted iCloud backups, first for every human on the planet and later, after Washington threw a tantrum, for British users alone. Secret being the operative word, since the law gagged Apple from so much as admitting the order existed.

      Apple’s answer was to rip its strongest encryption out of the UK entirely rather than build the thing, sniffing that it has “never built a backdoor or master key to any of our products or services,” and the fight is still grinding through the courts. That is the track record of this government, one that asks one company, in the dark, to dismantle encryption for an entire nation is not a government you hand a camera-side scanner and trust to use it gently.

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If Apple were truly serious about an individual’s security and privacy, they’d facilitate self hosted online services as peers to the versions they provide on their platforms.

    They can be best in class at what they do, but exclusively locking everyone into their ecosystem obliterates any meaningful good will.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    We have an easy peasy solution to that.
    We will just make it illegal for burglars to look under the mat.
    And if they do look under the mat, we will also make it illegal fro them to take the key.
    Finally we will also make it illegal for burglars to use the key.

    See there an absolutely bullet proof solution, so why does the tech industry continue to claim this is a bad idea?
    As a politician I simply can’t understand why they are so contrary to this idea that will increase safety for everybody!!

    /s (just in case)

    • foo@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      54 minutes ago

      I know it’s only a joke, but this comment highlights something that many folk in power seem to forget.

      Houses and their doormats are in a single physical location that has an unambiguous legal jurisdiction. In any given country, if you break into a house you are subject to that country’s laws.

      Not so with the Internet. It’s very difficult to legislate for something like this because other countries’ laws can just ignore you, and you have no power over those countries and their laws. So, making things physically secure is far more effective than legislation, especially when it comes to the Internet.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 minutes ago

        It’s not only a joke, it’s an analogy to show how stupid the claims of politicians are, that they want to have a backdoor for law enforcement.
        Of course the analogy isn’t perfect for the reasons you describe, and those reasons makes it actually worse.

    • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Or… you and a friend on another floor put your keys under each other’s mats. Then you both always have a way in and the chance of a burglar figuring it out is almost zero.

      • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        That’s security through obscurity, as well as shared keys.

        What happens when the burglar in waiting watches someone grab the key and use it?

        Or in the case of phone security, what happens when your address is printed on the key?

        A better analogy is fire lock boxes, where apartment complexes have a master key stored in a box out front that can be unlocked with a master key firemen carry.

        Unfortunately, that bic pen trick turned out to work on those lock boxes a decade or so ago, meaning all a burglar needed to get into ANY residence in ANY building with a fire lock box was a bic pen. In fact, a burglar could open the box, get the key, duplicate it, put it back in the box, and nobody would even know security had been compromised.

        It’s a pretty good analogy for what’s being asked for here.

    • SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Granted, it’s a work in progress; after all the commandment that says “You shall not steal” hasn’t fully stopped burgling or thieving, but I’m sure it will happen soon.

      • Today@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        They just haven’t shown it to enough school kids yet. That will fix it!

  • tourist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Talk is cheap

    Keep pretending that the NSA doesn’t already have a million backdoors in your proprietary garbage, Tim.

      • Snowcano@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        9 hours ago

        So where’s the actual story with the ’provided screenshots’? This article is just some rando saying things.

      • Ostfriesentee@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 hours ago

        This article is based on… a random twitter post that it does not even link to? I’d like to see concrete data supporting this claim.

        Whole article be like: source: trust me bro

        • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          It sounds like you trust Apple. I don’t

          From 2022: Apple sued for tracking users’ activity even when turned off in settings The iPhone maker knows a lot about what a user does on their phone.

          App developers and security researchers Tommy Mysk and Talal Haj Bakry from the software company Mysk recently found that iOS sends “every tap you make” to Apple from inside one of the company’s own apps. According to the developers, attempts to turn this data collection off, such as selecting the Settings option “disable the sharing of Device Analytics altogether” did not affect the data from being sent.

          https://mashable.com/article/apple-data-privacy-collection-lawsuit

          From 2026: Apple plans to change its Hide My Email privacy feature that could make it less effective

          Apple said in a note to developers on Monday that in the coming weeks the company will move its anonymously generated email addresses to @private.icloud.com, effectively making it easier for apps and websites to know that an email address is private and block users from signing up.

          Existing addresses will continue to function and forward mail without interruption, Apple said in the note to developers. The company added that app and email providers would have to update their filtering to ensure that emails to customers who rely on the feature continue to go through.

          Several Apple users on Reddit criticized the change to the email domain, saying it would make it more difficult to use the service.

          https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/16/apple-plans-to-change-its-hide-my-email-privacy-feature-that-could-make-it-less-effective/

          From 2026: Siri AI may be privacy-first, but the new ‘personal-context understanding’ features really creep me out

          Here’s the thing. it doesn’t actually matter how secure Apple makes its AI, I’m still not too keen on it being able to dive into the depths of my phone to score for data. It doesn’t matter if the goal of that is to hand over some random piece of potentially-helpful information when it thinks I might need it.

          https://tech.yahoo.com/ai/apple-intelligence/articles/siri-ai-may-privacy-first-051500606.html

          • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I don’t trust Apple, but I also don’t blanket distrust them. Of those three articles you posted, the only one that gives me pause is the one from 2022 where Apple was sending App Store navigation data back home. I have NEVER trusted the App Store. It has been intentionally hard to use, using dark patterns, and tracking usage ever since iPhone OS 2. Unfortunately for the researchers, it has also been very clear about this; it’s essentially a website that can only be accessed with their custom client.

            Up until recently, I’ve mostly trusted Apple because their business goals align with my personal goals; breaking that trust would only harm them without providing any benefit. Recently however, the services arm of the company has gone more aggressively into advertising; I don’t trust ANYTHING from Apple that’s linked to advertising, which now includes not only the App Store, iCloud, Books, News, Stocks, Fitness, Podcasts, Apple Music and Apple TV, but also Apple Maps.

  • ZeroGravitas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Why are you drawing your curtains? You must have something to hide. All your neighbours live in glass houses, why do you insist on this strange idea of privacy? Open up, if you’re not guilty there’s nothing to be afraid of.

    Only guilty people draw the curtains.

  • lyralycan@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    A burglar doesn’t intend to fuck up your whole life and/or extinguish it. I prefer the burglar over the cop.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    “But,” he continued, “If you put an obsolete anthrax-infected key under your mat, that’s one burglar we don’t have to worry about.”