Trey Parker and Matt Stone are probably two of the most courageous and talented satirist the world truly needs right now.

Props to them for being one of the only people who views Woke as something else other than just the cringe way of saying “Political Correctness”

Truly admirable and sagacious comedy CHADS!!!

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Ehh, they are funny but they have had some Ls in the past. Two episodes come to mind:

      • Both parties are the same
      • Comparing being trans to identifying as a dolphin.
      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        They’ve absolutely been on the wrong side before, but they’ve also acknowledged past mistakes. Climate change is a big example.

        We’re all wrong about stuff - and that’s okay. It’s what we do after we learn we’re wrong that matters.

        I grew up in a time and place that had me believing homosexuality was immoral and that white men were being discriminated against by affirmative action. What I believed was wrong, and is not representative of who I am now. But I didn’t have social media or a television network keeping a record of every time I said something awful.

          • Snowies@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Maybe let people improve without testing them incessantly?

            The type of reaction you had sometimes only serves to keep people from wanting to introspect and grow.

          • zbyte64@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            21 hours ago

            They did Team America World Police, in which the lesson is we are total dicks but some assholes need to be fucked.

      • SippyCup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Bro they’ve done 340ish episodes, they’re going to miss from time to time. 99.5% is pretty damn good.

      • Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        At least the first one is actually true…

        I mean, both parties (and any party in any place of the world) is the same: a bunch of mythomaniacs, sociopaths, psychopaths, narcissists, kleptomaniacs, pedophiles and murderers who don’t care about the citizens, the people, but only their own pockets and their shitty hedonisms.

      • lordziv@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        If you are comparing the establishment parties in America right now, it is pretty accurate that both parties are the same. They are both beholden to the private Epstein’s class and the corporate lobbying interests that they are bribed with. Not to mention that they are consistently on the wrong side by supporting Israel without a fault and even actively trying to jeopardize the chances of up and coming anti establishment progressive candidates.

        In regards to the dolphin episode, I know the one you are referring to and from my memory it had 0 reference to trans people. It was just about Kyle wanting to play in the NBA and his dad admitting he always wanted to be a dolphin. If you are reading that as a correlation with trans people, that’s on you.

      • DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        21 hours ago

        wp:Talk:South Park Republican#Pushing Republican Views

        (my bold)

        Yes they certainly do. Is everyone forgetting what Kyle says at the end of the Bin Laden episode? “America may have its problems, but it’s our home, and if you’re not gonna root for your home team, you might as well get the hell out of the stadium.”

        Another thing, Bush has been shown a few times on the show. Normally when Bush appear in a popular cartoon, he is made fun of for his incredible stupidity. Bush has NEVER BEEN MADE FN OF ON SOUTH PARK. They rarely give him lines, and when he does speak, Parker and Stone do not make him say anything stupid. This is implicitly pushing a Republican viewpoint on the audience and makes them believe Bush really isn’t all that bad when it is historical fact that he is hands-down the worst American president ever.

    • DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m conflicted: they are hilarious… but aren’t they billionaires? This is such a rare combo, I don’t know what to think. Lemmy, tell me what to think!

      • bedwyr@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        They actually earned their money though.

        It’s different, when they are fighting for the common good no less. And they’ve been doing so for the most part since after the 00s at least when they still kind of didn’t get how it was going to play out.

        If I had to criticize them, it would be they took some wrong takes, but who hasn’t? They did in good faith as I can see.

        • Snowies@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I’ve always felt like artists could be the one exception to “there should be no billionaires”.

          If you make tremendous wealth from many many many small payments for your art from many many people… that is not exploitation, that is success in its purest form.

          • JustPlainDave@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I mean, they created a wildly popular show that’s been around over 20 years. I can’t think of anything they’ve done otherwise. I’m sure it’s possible to earn a billion dollars, but highly unlikely. If anything, they’re the exception to the rule, I’d say.

            • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              22 hours ago

              Aside from South Park (which includes tons of merchandise, several games, and a movie) they did do a few movies (low forgettable Orgasmo, and cult classics BASEketball and Team America: World Police) and a WILDLY successful Broadway musical The Book of Mormon which won 9 Tony Awards.

              The bulk of those earnings like came from South Park in some form or fashion

          • urthoughtsrbad@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Yeah you would have a point. Except for the TV and movie industry, which famously has absolutely 0 victims…

            Hey that doesn’t sound so true??

            Maybe the fact that we like Trey and Matt making fun of people gives them the right to incidentally hurt others. “They earned it because I like it.”

              • urthoughtsrbad@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                18 hours ago

                You are right on. I think being able to acknowledge the bad parts of people is important.

                I like Trey and Matt, but they are not perfect people. If we are all the age we should be on here we shouldn’t have heroes.

      • hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        The fact they’re billionaires is the ultimate troll towards an administration that tries to censor and financially punish them. It’s a big fuck you.

      • tomatolung@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 day ago

        Wow, yes they are billionaires… due to a deal with Paramount+ whom they just made a very public dig at in this name change.

        https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattcraig/2025/07/25/south-parks-creators-are-now-billionaires/

        My opinion is, they have to be willing to pay their taxes, and not be worse then your ‘average driver who only cuts people accidentally’ rather than a BMW driver. I would expect them to make some serious self-deprecating digs at being billionaires as well. Also Casa Bonita needs to go International!

        (So at least Mark Cuban level of ‘don’t be evil’.)

        • hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Even Warren Buffet said something to the effect of, “Just tax me, I’m okay with that!”

          There’s this sort of mythos that exists that if you’re a billionaire you’re automatically smarter, more capable and harder-working than everyone else.

          It’s a myth, for sure. Most are not working physically harder than the guy scrubbing their excutive toilets, and making money is a very specific skill set. This is especially true for people who have primarily built wealth from investing, and/or came from generational wealth. If you have a lot of money, you either won the lottery, or you are really good at amassing wealth, along with being blessed by favorable circumstances.

          I think the billionaires who get this separate themselves from the evil exploitative assholes who only want to ruin the world for profit, while paying 0% taxes. It’s not an ego thing for them. While I still oppose a system that allows people to amass $1 billion of assets, sufficiently taxing the wealthy would be a good start.

    • story@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      saint vapeloki. people like you keep others from running JS that they can’t audit

  • LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Skewers”? C’mon, trump probably likes that they did this. Like if you asked him he would probably pick the name himself.

    • Snowies@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The clickbait language is giving us all dementia later in life I just know it.

      As one example, go to YouTube and search “Meidas Touch All Hell Breaks Loose”. It’s fucking depressing.

    • bedwyr@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      The first set of the new episodes skewering the prez, his press secretary wrote something along the lines of, ‘southpark hasn’t been relevant in forever.’

      After they dropped an episode or two, they replied, 'who is relevant now bitch? #eatabagofdicks

      • LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Oh I’m sure they make fun of him and others aplenty too in the episodes, but to claim they skewered him by changing the name, I disagree.

    • tacoplease@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      After the episodes with Trump’s mushroom pee pee talking and sex scenes with Satan, if Trump likes anything South Park, he’s gotta be demented.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sure he does, his sense of humor just isn’t funny to anybody else that isn’t also a psychopath. I should really say used too. His brain is mush these days.

        • hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          A MAGAs sense of humor is based on making fun of those different from what people “should” be, based on their narrow and inflexible worldview. In other words, punching down on others.

        • bedwyr@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Conservatives famously don’t have a sense of humour, unless you count laughing at people getting hurt.

            • bedwyr@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Name some artists, musicians, and comedians that are conservative then?

              The old school conservative, like my family, is not what we have now. My family has a great sense of humour.

                • bedwyr@piefed.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Yeah because my challenge has no answer, because there are almost no artists, comedians, or other such professions by conservatives in the modern era.

                  This is a long standing thing, how do you not know about this?

                  Name me a few bro, just one even, and I will show you an unfunny punching down piece of shit douchebag sell out.

        • Frozengyro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yup, unless he was told the US in North America he would not get this joke. He would likely assume they were supporting him.

  • DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    21 hours ago

    It’s been a while since I’ve seen South Park, but aside from their religious stuff, their humour, or attempts thereof, strikes me as either right-wing, lame, or both.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Dude they’re known libertarians. They moderated over time like all semi-rational people when exposed to Trump, but they had early episodes depicting the people tearing down the rainforest as heroes.

        • drev@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          they had early episodes depicting the people tearing down the rainforest as heroes.

          South Park is satire, and they very often use irony. I feel very rude for pointing that out, but you’ve missed the point entirely if you genuinely do think their intention was to… Depict deforestation as heroic…

          • aesthelete@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            It actually was their intention. They did a similar number for very many other issues. They were consistent in their libertarianism, and they were basically the animated version of Penn and Teller’s Bullshit for a pretty good stretch in that era. Many of their episodes tackled the same issues in much the same way.

            Penn Gillette was arguably more of a public mascot and mouthpiece for libertarianism, but both shows were heavily steeped in it.

            Watch it again with open eyes. There are lots of examples.

          • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            I don’t recall those episodes even though I definitely saw them, but that really doesn’t feel like that was the intent of the episode… that would be out of character

            edit: to be clear I do mean that it would be out of character to show deforestation as heroic, and that yes it must have been satire

            • aesthelete@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 hours ago

              I do mean that it would be out of character to show deforestation as heroic, and that yes it must have been satire

              They looked for these angles. They did a similar thing with trying to make tobacco companies look heroic.

              Look man, it’s not some kind of hidden thing that they were (or maybe are) right libertarians. It’s well documented for anyone who cares.

              I think there was even “South Park Republicans” floating around in the vernacular for a time (the reference is probably still on Wikipedia).

            • Baylahoo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              13 hours ago

              They have a super famous bit with the BP CEO acting like a giant dickhead apologizing for the massive oil spill when Obama was president. It’s some of the most on the nose satire of a corporate apology I’ve ever seen.

              • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                that’s the nipple rubbing, right? (among other occasions)

                because yeah that shit is on brand. I just don’t see them portraying deforestation as heroic

                • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  No, the nipple-rubbing was for cable companies (and was more fantastic satire.) The BP CEO included the guy lying naked on a rug in front of a fire place.

        • BrickEater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Have you any media literacy? Or are you basing this off of random clips and hearsay from friends. Because South Park has been well known for taking massive dumps on literally every demographic, and consistently standing by said dumps when people get pissy over being rightfully satirized.

          • aesthelete@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            I watched the first episode when it aired dude.

            Watch the episode about hybrid vehicles, starving Africans, goobacks, etc, etc, etc forever.

            Back when South Park was extremely relevant they and Penn and Teller’s show Bullshit were basically the mechanisms for poisoning everyone with libertarian ideology.

            (Though I feel obliged to say they are at least funny unlike today’s right wing comedians.)

            They were all funny to me as a twenty something. I watched all of them. Their politics still consistently sucked balls.

            • BrickEater@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Yeah so have I and so did I. I grew up with nothing but Comedy Central on TV at my dads.

              If you think they were making fun of Goobacks, youre once again missing the whole episodes point of doing better for those around you and the world in general to prevent massive immigration.

              They weren’t shitting on hybrids, they were shitting on the smug ass owners of them which very much was a thing, now they’ve just transitioned to being Tesla owners.

              And I don’t remember starving Africans well enough rn to dispute you, but I genuinely think you’re viewing their show through a reactionary lense and immediately clutching your pearls.

              For as crass and immature as the show is on a surface level, there’s tons of nuance as you get deeper into the meanings you’re meant to gleam from it.

              The characters basically never learn or become better as people because they’re not supposed to.

              I garuntee if you sat down and actually watched the show, youd realize very quickly these guys only hate pretentious hypocrites, racists, bigots and politicians. But most people miss that because they’ve decided you can’t poke fun at anyone without being part of that group, entirely missing Matt and Treys point for the last 30 years.

    • auzy1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Literally nothing about those two suggests they support Trump or people similar to Charlie kirk

      They’re similar to Jimmy Carr. They make a lot of offensive jokes, but at the end of the day, you can tell quite easily where they stand (ie, for other people, not for themselves)… And, there are regularly moments of “clarity” where they demonstrate this.

      Whereas, with people like Trump, when they act like they’re joking, there are moments of “clarity” where they slip up, and it becomes clear they aren’t