• 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s also that so much work is pointless and doesn’t serve a proper purpose for humanity. Things like ads, a lot of office jobs where people sit in endless meetings, and so on.

    I think humanity has realized it’s wasting our lives but we can’t think of another system that will work.

    Maybe universal income but the downside of that is that it comes with AI and transhumanism, which will remove what is human about humans.

    • Eq0@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I hate how a big chunk of my work has become to write reports nobody should read. Our team produces a report every January, that gets passed to our director, that gets compiled into a yearly lab wide report, that gets combined into a 5-year report, that get sent to the government to ensure continuous funding… so much time wasted by everyone

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I’m 51 now and I learned from 25 years of working that wasting time is not a problem for large corporations år governments. Even in smaller companies, they value people being forced into office much higher than employees producing work.

        So the conclusion for me is that its just a system to keep everyone busy and conform to rules set by the corporation.

    • Ex Nummis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sure we can think of better. It’s just that the only people with the power to change or implement any of it are financially incentivized not to. So they don’t.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        If the corporate fantasy of replacing all jobs with AI were to actually come to pass, what are all the now jobless people supposed to do? Quietly wait in a back alley to starve to death?

        So either universal income happens, or the one percent learn that there’s no level of technology that will overcome a two orders of magnitude disadvantage in numbers.

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Because the alternatives are pointless toil or perishing (spoilers: neither of these are off the table)

          • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            It’s assuming a lot, but running with the premise of bots totally replacing human workers (dubious), either workers keep working even though they don’t need to (pointles toil), or they cease to exist as they last lever on power is removed (the ability to bargain by withholding their labour).

            It’s silly