• Tiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    27 minutes ago

    It’s Taco Bell logic. You love our chicken nuggets and caramel empanadas? We sold out in 3 days? Well they’re discontinued so fuck you. Ok guys, sales are down and we can’t figure out why, we need ideas.

  • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Lol yeah it’s the exact same [facetious] logic as expecting increasing the working day from 10 ~> 20 hours to lead to increased productivity.

    It’s almost like ample and adequate rest need to be baked into scheduling?

    • ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      38 minutes ago

      4 day work weeks often means working four 10hr shifts. Same hours but less start and stop adds to productivity, and that extra day off during the work week means you can schedule things that day that otherwise would require time off during work hours. That extra day off really helps both employer and employee.

      4 tens is so much better than 5 eights.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 minutes ago

        I’ve tried that before. I get less done on a 10 hour shift than I do in 8. Have to wake up too early and go home too late. It’s torturous.

        Now a 32 hour week for the same pay is peak. Doesn’t even need to be three continuous days off. A weekend and a Wednesday is good enough.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 minutes ago

      Yeah because people are more well rested with 3 days off. So they can focus better during the workday.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I guess at this point, with the million plus recently laid off, humanity is just lucky we ate able to leave freely and not progressed into biofuel to fun data centers slop factories.

  • UnLocoPoco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Just like before AI employees used to code 1000 lines/day. With AI 1000 lines can be written in a few mins. Imagine what an overworked employee can code using AI in a day. #Efficiency

  • flandish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    6 hours ago

    while we know this post is fake, this is the logic capitalists use. it is the logic they hide, the lede they bury, when they report on how efficient ai will make us.

  • robomuffin79@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Capitalism in a nutshell. Treat your employees like expendable assets and squeeze every last drop out of them

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The only silver lining to ending slavery for the owner class was that at least now the cogs were responsible for their own room and board and etc

      *acknowledging that slavery hasn’t truly, universally ended

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It’s also that so much work is pointless and doesn’t serve a proper purpose for humanity. Things like ads, a lot of office jobs where people sit in endless meetings, and so on.

    I think humanity has realized it’s wasting our lives but we can’t think of another system that will work.

    Maybe universal income but the downside of that is that it comes with AI and transhumanism, which will remove what is human about humans.

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        60 minutes ago

        Because the alternatives are pointless toil or perishing (spoilers: neither of these are off the table)

    • Ex Nummis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Sure we can think of better. It’s just that the only people with the power to change or implement any of it are financially incentivized not to. So they don’t.

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      56 minutes ago

      Semantics, but my interpretation is that work can be uplifting. Like yard work is work. Helping friends move is work. Working on your life drawing is work. Working out is maybe even work.

      Jobs on the other hand are what I could do without.

      But like I said, it’s just semantics. I agree with you.

      • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 minutes ago

        I wanted to spend a good chunk of my life volunteering.

        I can hardly take care of chores with how overwhelmed I am. I will try 3 Concerta pills either Monday or Thursday

  • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The problem is the workplaces don’t want that. if you’re happier and have more energy, it also makes you more uppity and harder to control. You might even find options for other work!

    If it means keeping you tired and broken, that’s worth the cost of a little productivity.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 hours ago

      You might even find options for other work!

      Not many other places offer a 4-day week for same salary.
      This to give up would be a major strong point…

      And to be honest…I’d actually work an hour more a day (36h week) to have a monday - thursday week just for the same or higher wage.

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      15 hours ago

      But is that really so? i would think that a better work life balance makes the employees inclined to remain at their job instead of hopping elsewhere. Probably even at the expense of a higher salary at another place that would instead demand the grind again.

      • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Take a look at are little friend remote work. Almost all employees love it. Retention is thru the roof at places that offer it. More than half of workers say they’d even take a pay cut to keep it. Productivity isn’t affected in most cases (ymmv obviously). Buuuuut guess who absolutely can’t stand it? Management. They’ll go to the ends of the earth to make sure you don’t get it. Ask yourself why.

      • jonline@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        15 hours ago

        You’re not accounting for the emotional needs of management. Many of them are cruel. They put value in making their workers squirm.

        We should have worker owned things instead of the petty tyranny of capitalism, but here we are.

      • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        15 hours ago

        People, generally speaking, have an absolutely infuriating tendency to adapt to good things. They eventually look for more. The best way to prevent this, from an employer’s perspective, is to break their spirit. Learned helplessness is one of the only ways to permanently keep a free person in a bad situation.

  • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    181
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    “So we went back to five days, and now productivity is down to effectively three days, what went wrong?”

    Executives, everywhere.

    • terminatortwo@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      84
      ·
      13 hours ago

      This happened to me.

      I requested four days and laid out a plan on what “success” looked like. We tried it. After six months my boss and I agreed all my metrics had improved, so he put me back in five days because “imagine how productive you’ll be now”, so I quit a couple of months after.

      • toynbee@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        When I accepted my current job, I did so on the conditions that I’d work 4x10 and fully from home (after training). When I started, they said there had been a misunderstanding about full WFH and that I was allowed to WFH one day a week. (That eventually changed during COVID but no one ever apologized to me for lying to me.)

        Seven years later - last year - they told me that it was “unfair” that I’m the only person who had a special schedule (apparently I was the last person to have it, but I certainly was not the only) and took that away, too.

        I live in a rural area and will not be able to find a comparable job nearby. I’ve been contemplating what to do.

    • Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      16 hours ago

      On my first job the boss was telling a story about one of his previous jobs, where at one point they had to redo a whole week’s worth of work in one night. They tried hard and managed to do it. So I just added: “it’s in those times one see how slow they usually work”

        • Q@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Marathons don’t move at the speed of business though. Progress moves business faster. Commerce IS business. Fast businesses use speed to move faster than their clients speed.

          Business, business business. Speed. Solutions.

          Edit: how am I being downvoted lol - obviously what I wrote is nonsense straight from every Amazon, UPS, IBM commercial every made. Maybe I’m just moving at the speed of business. Keep up!

      • untorquer@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        12 hours ago

        redo

        Or rather we see just how much labor original work is compared to replication.