CORRECTION: A previous version of this article misstated that this poll had a likely voter screen. Democrats have a 57%-40% lead among men ages 18-30 who say they’re the most determined to vote.

  • Deacon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 hours ago

    As I turn into an old man, it’s almost overwhelming the realization of just how fucking dumb the average young man is.

    • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      25 minutes ago

      Cambridge Analytica, gamer gate, and others have steered the younger generation to the right. It was a designed psyop to make Republicans relevant again, and it worked. The younger (white) males are still in my experience pretty fucking stupid and ignorant. I hope they’ve opened their minds a bit, but there were (and still are) very powerful voices trying to take advantage of their insecurities and turn them into fascists. It’s hard to hold them fully accountable for that reason but God damn is it hard to try to get through to these people.

    • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Let’s be honest though, when were were young, we were pretty stupid too. I mean I used to have some level of respect for Libertarians back in the day.

        • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 minutes ago

          Eh, 9/11 did a number on me, and were I of age in 2004, I would have likely voted for Bush because I was young, dumb, and ignorant. By 2008 (the first election I was 18 for) I could see the Republicans for what they were, and made it a point to vote otherwise. How anyone grows beyond a certain age and thinks these guys have the answers to fucking anything is beyond me though.

      • Deacon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Oh 100%, I think that’s the overwhelming part for me. These fucking idiots keep showing me my past self.

        I used to be a libertarian back in the day; partly because I didn’t understand socialism, or libertarianism for that matter. But I think mostly because my prefrontal cortex hadn’t fully developed yet so my capacity for empathy was limited.

        I was pretty fucking stupid.

        • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Hey at least we lived and learned, grew past the whole teenaged edgelord phase of things. More than I can say for some of those Gen-Xer’s I grew up with.

          • Deacon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Right on, and we keep living and learning by remaining humble about how fucking dumb we still are.

            • PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 hours ago

              As we age, the ego takes a step back and it becomes easier to accept our shortcomings. The more I learn the more I realize I don’t know sort of thing.

      • raze2012@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Libertarianism makes sense in a culture where you feel markets will keep themselves honest.

        Reality , of course, is disappointing and I was a stupid young man for believing that.

        • Deacon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I think the unspoken and fatal prerequisite for libertarianism is that it requires a truly equal society that doesn’t have white supremacy baked into it.

          It doesn’t cause that kind of society, it needs it to be preexisting, and so in the context of modern America it would just serve to bolster the existing inequalities.

            • Deacon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Direct action is the insistence, when faced with structures of unjust authority, on acting as if one is already free.

              -David Graeber

              We need each other to do things that we can’t do for ourselves. If we are intimately connected with each other, we just give things to each other; if we don’t know each other we find another way to handle it. If you think about it, each according to his or her abilities and each according to his or her needs is sort of the same thing as supply and demand.

              -David Graeber

              Brilliant.

              I have been going down a David Graeber rabbit hole for the past few months, and I am certainly on that trajectory. It’s funny, I’ve heard anecdotally that there is a surprisingly direct pipeline from disillusioned evangelical christian to anarchist, and it makes sense. The principles of anarchy resonate with the most basic lessons we are taught and which Christianity has sort of claimed for itself as how to be godly.

              Anarchy has an amazingly bad branding challenge though, especially in America. I thought socialism had a bad brand, and then I started learning what anarchy actually is. Yikes.

              I would say I am totally aligned intellectually with the principles of anarchy as I understand them today, and yet I still reflexively equate the very word with “disorder” and “chaos”. I have to be very intentional to turn my intellectual agreement into an actual warm fuzzy vibe when I hear or read the word. The connotations are set deep. I don’t think I’m unique or even in the minority in that regard, and I’m certain that’s no accident. Right now my sense of things is that socialism is the most practical path to anarchy, but even reading back the words I just wrote, I think at least half of america would think I was describing some sort of leftist terror plot.

              On the bright side, I do think that the open corruption and incompetence of our world leaders has begun to undercut the baked in idea that rulers create order. Hopefully the more we as a society see the man behind the proverbial curtain and parse the real fact that Nobody Knows What They Are Doing, the necessity of mutual aid begins to become more clear.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I agree with a lot of the libertarian beliefs, but the people who actually call themselves that are absolutely insane.

        • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Believing in freedom, equality and liberty for all is great until you meet someone that wants to remove all rules and regulations.

          • Deacon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 hours ago

            It advocates for equality while destroying the institutions that could create equality.

            I get why it appeals to young white men - they don’t need the federal government because it was built to work for them, and so it all looks like waste.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          That’s because most libertarians are just ashamed conservatives/gop/magats

          I fall into a social libertarian political spectrum more than anything else. I believe most people do when they are ok with private companies, socialism for citizens and regulations for said private companies.

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Eh. At least they’re (presumably) learning their lesson instead of sticking their heads in the sand. It sucks that they put Cheeto McPedo into power, but hopefully this leads to evwryone waking up and putting a stop to MAGA

      • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 minutes ago

        It wasn’t them. Millenial men voted more for trump than gen Z, and X more than millenials. Looking at the raw data, you’d come away assuming the race was more about gender than age, compared to past elections.