“Newspaper which uses AI to write its articles concocts derogatory term for people who doesn’t use AI”

This makes about as much sense as calling Linux users “Windows vegans”.

Choosing to not use AI isn’t some wacky contrarian position, it’s a tame position that can easily be justified. (Don’t want to use AI? Then don’t.) If anything, trying to assert that constantly using AI for everything would be the new normal is the wacky position.

The better term would be “LLM gobbling fuckheads” for those who use that stuff and believe it has anything to do with “AI”

Journalists constantly trying to be the origin of a term.

I played around on an AI image generating website for a while. Eventually got bored with it.

Let’s not call it that

“refuse” lol as if there were a general requirement to use this shit

No an Image generation is not ten times the impact pf a Google search, a ChatGPT query is. Image generation is probably a lot more.

We don’t need to invent new terms, like ‘AI Vegan’, when we have a perfectly good term already: Butlerian Jihadist.

Can we please stop coming up with words that describe that we do not do a thing like it is not normal? Just like having to call yourself an atheist because you do not believe. You should call yourself a theist if you believe, because you actively do it. Call yourself what you are, do, or see fit, not what you are not.

“AI vegans”? I knew guardian was already bought by tech bros, but wtf is that phrasing lmao I dont use AI either, simply because it is wrong more often than not and I am still capable of googling myself, but being cautious equals to being vegan in tech bro eyes?

I don’t use ai either. But because it’s fuckin stupid. It’s not even ai. It’s a glorified sorting algorithm.

While billionaires keep using their private jets.

“AI vegans” media trying to put an enemy up again. Smh

Dafuq Do they forgot to teach AI how to read two column text AGAIN?!