• flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 day ago

    Advertising being allowed to become the dominant monetization method for the internet was a mistake.

    I’ve never seen anything that makes most of its money from advertising that doesn’t get worse and worse for it over time as a result. Once you let the advertisers in they will ruin whatever it is they are being allowed to leech off of. Might take 1 year, might take 20, but once they get that foot hold they will run it into the ground because like a billionaire and money, it is never enough.

    • Two9A@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      14 hours ago

      So I work at DeviantArt, and we actually saw this in real-time. A few years ago, we added external ads all over the place, and had to add a whole framework to detect “ad-unsafe” works that wouldn’t get ads served against them. So we only got ads against a percentage of views, and people were getting pissed at the ads and leaving.

      So we tore the ads back out, traffic’s recovered, and a focus on providing actual tools for artists to make money through the site has meant we’re doing better without ads than we were with ads.

      • That Weird Vegan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        that’s the thing. People will generally support a service they like. If it has ads, most people won’t like it and thus won’t support it.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Extend that from “advertisers” to “capitalists” and you’ll be much more correct.

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      don’t forget to manually enable the annoyances and cookie banners filters as they help a lot.

  • rhvg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    You will soon miss the display banner as it’s at least honest for being an ad. AI will soon have ads weaved in the text itself.

    • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ublock origin creates an anti-intext filter that filters out text with key phrases indicating an advertisement XD

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’d rather have ads placed in the text in a context that makes sense than the abomination of a system we have now that is both intrusive and irrelevant.

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’d rather have manipulative content placed in the text in a context that makes sense than the abomination of a system we have now that is both intrusive and irrelevant.

  • teft@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    If you have ublock origin you should be able to use the element picker to block that frame.

          • 3abas@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            The question isn’t why you avoid sites that use ads, it’s why you don’t have an ad blocker for the one-off situations that you do, like this one.

            Or did you go to that particular article on techcrunch as part of your routine of checking if you made the right choice to avoid such sites?

            Clearly sometimes you have to go to those sites, and when you do, you’re exposing yourself to ads, tracking, and potential malware unnecessarily…

          • ikidd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            It’s also way faster to browse with an adblocker because your browser isn’t connecting, downloading and processing a bunch of images and scripts to present that bullshit. Like 80% faster.

  • XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Just get a bigger screen. But you can’t buy bigger screens these days except as smart TVs or monitors… And those smart screens can detect when you aren’t interacting with them and display ads…

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    you can enable CSD in firefox to cut down on these titlebars a bit

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        i should have been clearer: client-side decorations.

        boils down to not having a separate titlebar. by right clicking an empty spot in the tab bar and clicking “customize toolbar”, there will be an option to disable it, and get more vertical pixels of screen space. it will work more like windows and most linux environments. i don’t know why OP’s isn’t doing this by default, it should.

        if you want even more vertical space, go to about:config, set compactmode to true, then a more compact ui will be available in the customize toolbar menu. vertical tabs are not bad either after you get used to them.

  • pooberbee (they/she)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    YMMV but switching to vertical tabs might be an improvement. Especially with such a wide screen, and since most websites (especially articles) only use a narrow column in the center, it’s been great for me.

  • asdfranger@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    That’s why reading mode exists, I use it all the time when I see sites as cluttered as this. Great feature.

    (It’s the little rectangle icon near the bookmark button, on the navigation bar)

  • MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    What resolution are you browsing at? I have a hard time showing that ad at all in my setup, but I’m not even at 4K and I get a HUGE picture of the rocket in question and still see more text than you show in the screenshot. That’s what? 720p?

    I man, don’t get me wrong, ads are annoying, there’s a reason why I have so many layers of blocking I couldn’t even shut them all off to test this, but you seem to be browsing at what I’d call… legacy resolutions. You’d almost be better off twisting that screen 90 degrees and asking for the mobile version. Or, you know, you could lower the UI scaling in your display settings.

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      i’m at 1080p. the resolution is low but i need it that low because if i increase the resolution to make everything smaller, it’s too small for my eyes and it actually hurts my eyes. i need a big font, big icons, everything.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’d strongly suggest running a higher resolution (if your monitor supports it) and just using the various scaling/accessibility options of your OS. I cannot handle raw 4k any more, but I’ve been running with it just fine at 150% scale for probably over a decade now, on various versions of Windows and Linux (XFCE and Plasma, mostly). Only the very rare ancient program from Windows XP days won’t scale properly, and even then you can just tell the window manager to scale the whole thing.

        I say all this because things will literally be clearer and more legible if you run your monitor at native resolution and have the OS/browser render things larger. If your monitor is 1080p… well… I guess just know you shouldn’t have to fear being picky with a new one if/when the time comes!

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Ah. That’s more of an accessibility issue than an advertising issue, then. I imagine even without ads a bunch of modern websites expecting higher resolutions and smaller scaling factors will look cramped.

        I was not kidding before, if you have vision problems that don’t play well with desktop views, mobile versions of websites tend to be a LOT friendlier to large text sizes. Have you tried setting your browser to a vertical window and calling up the phone version? On Firefox at least you can set the resolution of the phone you’re emulating and zoom it all the way up. The setting is buried in the developer tools, but there are tons of tutorials out there (TLDR, press F12, look for the button that looks like a tablet/phone). I’ll try to add an image of what it looks like on my device for the site you shared.

        • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          yeah i guess the issue could also be solved with a larger screen (mine is currently A4paper sized) but i don’t have much space for it in my apartment, and also i don’t like the high cost and inflexibility of such a setup. i like my setup to stay small and flexible.