• BilSabab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    we used to have bunnies and ducks and one time we were cleaning up the bunny place and transferred rabbits to a nearby coop. The ducks gathered around it and started quacking at bunnies in this bully manner the ducks do - and then one of the ducks stuck their head into the coop and mama bunny fucked up this motherfucker and turned the coop upside down in the process. that duck got the scarface nickname as a result.

      • BilSabab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        they are also incredibly bothersome to look after in general. i’d take chicken or geese all day.

  • obvs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I am convinced that dinosaurs looked completely different than is being guessed with their skeletons.

  • M137@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s
    “What * * like” (What it looks like)
    OR
    “How * *” (How it looks)
    It’s never
    “How * * like”

    How is this so fucking hard to get right.

  • starik@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    163
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Scientists are the ones who figured out that dinosaurs had feathers. Whenever science is proven wrong, it’s with more/better science.

      • edwardbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        No. Not weird. Dangerous. Only people in the world, who get to hold a “told ya so” sign, while civilisation and humanity burns, out of their own hubris

      • GreenShimada@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        2 days ago

        One of the reasons I would love to travel to the future is to see all the ways that people and science are confidently incorrect about depictions of dinosaurs now, and how they’re depicted like 300 years in the future. Even within my lifetime, we’ve gone from slow, fat lizard turds to something realistic like this lil’ guy. Amazing stuff.

        • ryper@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          2 days ago

          You might also get to see incorrect depictions of animals from our time that are extinct in the future, depending on how much information is lost between now and then.

        • VonReposti@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          I share your sentiment but I’d rather go back and see for myself. The future is completely unknown, who knows if you’d land right on the front line in WWIII. At least in the past I have a vague idea of what parts of time to avoid landing in.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            2 days ago

            You could say the same for the past, we don’t know when dinosaur World War 2 was, perhaps you’ll meet dinosaur Elon Musk and have to talk to him, it’s a hell of a risk.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m glad it was so happy when it died. Doing itsy little walk, my cat does that when he has successfully captured the elusive ball of foil.

    • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Science success story:

      Aboriginal religions generally hold that long ago in the Dreaming times, the world was cold, there was less water, and the coast was further away. You used to be able to walk to many of the islands around the Australian coast, because there were land bridges.

      White people generally assumed these stories were mythological fiction, because white people are often racist and intolerant. However, science eventually figured out that 10,000 years ago, there was an ice age. The polar ice caps were bigger, and the ocean was shallower. Those land bridges were found under the modern ocean through satellite imaging. Aboriginal religions were right, and science proved that these religious histories had been preserved and kept accurate for 10,000 years!

      Science wins again!

    • bedwyr@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      While true about the proto feathers dinosaurs had, the mis id of their species as reptiles lives on to this day. Half the population doesn’t even know they are from birds, and were warm blooded.

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Eh? Dinosaurs are reptiles in any system of classification I know of.

        I’m not quite sure what you’re getting at but it sounds like you’re referring to the fact that, cladistically, birds are dinosaurs. But there were non-bird dinosaurs, and what this all means for the clades is just that all birds are reptiles.

        Of course normally we are not speaking cladistically. In that context, birds are not dinosaurs, but dinosaurs are still reptiles, and reptiles excludes birds.

        • bedwyr@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Birds are ancestors of dinosaurs. They were warm blooded, any split with reptiles happened long since. Jesus Christ.

          • FishFace@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Birds are descendants of dinosaurs.

            It doesn’t make sense to talk of “splits” unless you presume a cladistic view, which I explicitly did not. The point of a split is ill-defined unless you’re talking about a clade.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 day ago

    Check out the coffee table book, All Yesterdays. It’s half reinterpretations of known fossils, half artist renderings of contemporary animals based only on their skeletons. We’re obviously misinterpreting a lot of creatures going just off their skeletons and we’ll never know how they really appeared.

    As I recall, this is from the skeleton of a contemporary species of monkey, as an example:

  • Robotunicorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s the most foul, cruel, and bad-tempered rodent you ever set eyes on! He’ll do you up a treat, mate.

  • GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    Their spines are fascinating. They’re designed to store a lot of potential energy and release it in short bursts.

    Rabbits can fuckin’ move, and the biomechanics behind why is absolutely enthralling.