• Aneb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 hours ago

          GNU/Linux Copypasta

          I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re refering to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.

          Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called Linux, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.

          There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine’s resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called Linux distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux!

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      OMG!

      I booted Debian Linux on a 4-bit intel microprocessor from 1971 - the first microprocessor in the world - the 4004. It is not fast, but it is a real Linux kernel with a Debian rootfs on a real board whose only CPU is a real intel 4004 from the 1970s. The video is sped up at variable rates to demonstrate this without boring you. The clock and calendar in the video are accurate. A constant-rate video is linked below.

      https://dmitry.gr/?r=05.Projects&proj=35.+Linux4004

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’m sure someone could figure out how to boot Linux on a vacuum tube computer. The problem is there just aren’t that many around that are still operational.

    • Zwiebel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Of course you can run it on tubes, in principal, since they do the same as transistors at the end of the day

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Not quite just a transistor but maybe something like this (an SOC with 32MB ram which costs about $5 in bulk) though it does require quite a bit of additional electronics to work.

    Also somebody also made an embedded Linux for the ESP32-S3 (which is even cheaper and doesn’t require anywhere as much auxiliary electronics).

    PS: Yeah, I got the joke. Just pointing out that the reality itself is quite impressive.

    • StabbingSky@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Some crazy fucker got the OG Tomb Raider to run on an ESP chip.

      Although the ESP is significantly more powerful than the original console.

      • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        funny thing - the SDRAM used provides 300kb/sec, while the SDcard used as storage provides 200kb/sec. Performancewise they could just skip most of the ram outside of booting and use the SDcard without losing much performance, especially since the SDRAM needs to be refreshed every 62ms for a duration of 3ms regardless of use.

        Edit: I LOVE this part:

        It takes about 2 hours to boot to bash prompt (“init=/bin/bash” kernel command line). Then 4 more hours to boot up the entire Ubuntu (“exec init” and then login). Starting X takes a lot longer. The effective emulated CPU speed is about 6.5KHz, which is on par with what you’d expect emulating a 32-bit CPU & MMU on a measly 8-bit micro. Curiously enough, once booted, the system is somewhat usable. You can type a command and get a reply within a minute. That is to say that you can, in fact, use it. I used it to day to format an SD card, for example. This is definitely not the fastest, but I think it may be the cheapest, slowest, simplest to hand assemble, lowest part count, and lowest-end Linux PC. The board is hand-soldered using wires, there is not even a requirement for a printed circuit board.

        6 hours to get into X is ridiculous- and i misread - it takes 6 hours to boot , and then hours more to get an X server running lol

    • Zwiebel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      >Not quite
      >has about 1.5 million gates in the CPU alone
      >each gate is multiple transistors

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Well, as two people already pointed out, turns out somebody got Linux to run on the 8-bit ATMega1284p microcontroller which comes in a DIP package, though it’s 44 pin rather than 32.

      • zip@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Gosh, his character as ‘himself’ on Arrested Development was so damn good. It gets me every time. I think I’m way past due for another rewatch; thanks for reminding me! This was also a wonderful usage of the reference and gif! :)

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Plot twist: it’s actually a whole SoC packaged to look like a single transistor, with the pins being for +V, ground, and a 1-Wire data bus.

      I don’t know that such a thing exists, but these days I bet it could.

    • WFH@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      12 hours ago

      You’re right. A lightbulb plugged into a potato is the real minimum system requirement.

    • mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Linux requires at least 32 bit machine words, and it always has. Linux was originally written for Intel 80386.

      Linux requires a hardware MMU to support virtual memory. There are patches that can make a no-MMU kernel, but it drastically changes the experience to do so.

      • yogurtwrong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Well it is kinda cheating but Linux does “run” on a intel 4004 running a MIPS emulator

        I think you could cook something like a 4-bit turing complete computer with around 100 transistors or so. And i guess turing completeness basically means “it will run with enough elbow grease” in this case

        (if we exclude memory from the transistor count…)

  • tetris11@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Shows image of a common NPN bipolar low power transistor

    You’re telling me that a Japanese (Nippon) person with wild mood swings and low self esteem who identifies as a trans sister, also runs Linux? How is this news.

  • Axolotl@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    This meme made me wonder what’s the minimum number of transistors needed to run linux