• boonhet@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I suggest vehicle length and width limits for parking lots. Parking fines for those who exceed them, and make the fines bigger the more the vehicle exceeds it.

    At least where I live, vehicle technical data is publicly available by license plate, so it’d be trivial to implement too. The Europark guys will literally stand around and wait for your parking clock to expire if you stay for 2 minutes too long, how about they do something more useful instead.

    Either it’ll make people reconsider driving these large beasts in the city, or the owners of the parking lots get extra revenue. Either way at least it’ll cost the giant truck owners money.

    • Mommy Longarms@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Honestly, requiring a separate license for larger vehicles would probably be more effective. It’s already pretty common to have separate licenses for different classes of vehicles.

      Make it require a more rigorous driving test, and maybe more expensive too. We should probably also outlaw consumer vehicles with such shit visibility anyway, but that’s a different issue.

    • aquovie@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Parking lots are built and run out of a desire to get people to park there (so that they don’t go somewhere else). A garage owner is not going to willfully limit his customer base without a good reason. And “providing a happy parking experience” is not good enough. Driving and looking for parking is already not a happy feeling. It’s a case of “the customer is always right (even if they’re a dick)”.

      You’d need the government to force these limits and then it’s not about just parking: it’s regulating vehicle size entirely.

    • MrNesser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’ve had a ticket for not fully parking in the bay before, this should more than qualify

      • EveningPancakes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        LPT: Super glue a BB pellet into the plastic air stem cap. Results in a slow leak over time, and it may take the owner a couple of times filling up the tire to realize what the problem is.

  • iegod@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I get piled on every time but no one needs a modern pickup. There is a more suitable vehicle for your needs if you are in trades, and a pickup isn’t it. Need people space? Same deal.

    • Mommy Longarms@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 minutes ago

      Even worse they COULD make trucks that do everything new trucks do without being so huge. Kei trucks would do most of what people use American trucks for.

      Hell, American trucks used to do everything modern ones do at half the size.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        D’uh. Vans are more lockable, there’s more space, you can just walk straight into them, they have much shorter hoods so that more of their length can be for storage than for just being long for the sake of it, and they are way more modifiable than people think. A work van is still body-on-frame so they’re perfectly capable towing vehicles to boot.

        Trucks do one thing better, and that is having a bed that can be removed/taken up for more useful things like fifth-wheel hookups and towing rigs. I guess you can also maybe put a single haybale in there, but actual farmers who aren’t cosplaying don’t move their shit one bale at a time while pretending they’re Ford Tough™.

        U-haul rents pickups but there’s a reason you never really see them. Why would I go through all that trouble and cost and not at least get the van?

      • Photonic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yes, obviously, but they are already making pick up trucks that have a sealable bed. They also have pick ups that have a raised construction on the bed with a roof. Next step is a double door on the rear and they will just be vans again.

        • Mpatch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Do you actualy have any real trades experience. Or are you just barking?

          • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I do. My family ran a house construction company. We never bought anything but vans because:

            1. materials are expensive, and it rains.

            2. Tools are expensive, and it rains.

            3. Materials are expensive, and people steal.

            4. Tools are expensive, and people steal.

            5. Shit falls out of pickup beds all the time. Every fucking day a load is lost on a highway.

            6. Most pickups can’t even carry 4x8 sheets with the tail up. Poser work trucks.

            7. Vans have a lower loading height, and can be accessed from 3 points.

            8. FWD vans can actually be driven in snow, as opposed to a stupid design that puts the drive wheels at the wrong end of the vehicle, which means poor ground clearance because of the differential and driveshaft, so they mount bigger wheels. Dumb on top of dumb.

            I understand the constant TV commercials about payload with Sam Elliot narrations but get fucking serious, most construction trades do not use their own vehicles, they just commute to the work site.

            • Mpatch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              5 hours ago

              No just calling out your lack of practical understanding of skilled trades.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Yes, that is what they all use here because its just better. A roof keeps your tools dry and if someone wants to steal it they need to break in rather than just grabbing it.

        • Mpatch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Where is here? This is just pathetic. You ever load a skid of material/ equipment into a van? It’s do able with the right size fork lift I guess, pain in the ass though when you got two skids worth to load unload. How about when you only have a crane avaliable? How about when you have petrol cans / slip tanks to bring to a job site to fill up your crane/ excavator? You think a guy wants those fumes in his cab? Need a dump box for landscape work? Pull of your bed and put one on. Want to get into tow and recovery, pull of your bed and put a tow lift on. Need a flat deck? Guess what you got it for the price of fun. Need a welding rig? Guess what it’s right there put the welder in the back and gas bottles. What you gona fill the van cab with exaust fumes from the welder and risk leaking oxy/propane/acetylene into your nice and dry van cab? But hey your shit will be dry right?

          • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Usually people needing bigger than a van here get flatbeds rather than US style pickup trucks

          • ContriteErudite@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            My guy, no one is saying that pick up trucks are useless. What they are saying is that trucks are too big and too expensive for what the majority of buyers use it for. Many Americans buy their pick up trucks for symbolic cultural status, not pragmatic trades use.
            I once spent a summer installing new milking parlors at dairy farms in central PA. The welder, tanks, PPE, and the rest of our tools fit just fine into an old transit van with sliding side doors, rear double doors, a hitch to tow the generator, and a roof rack for large items like pipes and ladders. A box truck was used to deliver material pallets to each worksite.

            The company I use for plumbing and HVAC uses vans. The carpet cleaning service I use has their cleaning machine built inside of a van. When I had to transport 50+ computers to refresh satellite office hardware I used a minivan with removable seats.

            Could a pick up have done all those jobs? Absolutely. However, we didn’t need a pick up to do all those jobs, and the vehicles we did use were much smaller and less expensive. That is what people in this thread are saying. Most modern pick up trucks are not designed for trade use; today’s midsize pickups are larger than full-size pickups from 20 years ago, and they have the bells and whistles that you’d expect to see in a higher end passenger car, instead of the vinyl/plastic interiors that they used to have ~20 years ago.

            EDIT: I just saw that the original person you responded to did say that no one needs a truck. They were probably being hyperbolic, as there are use cases for pick up trucks, so I can see where your push back came from.

      • Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Or an older pickup with equivalent bed space and no weight wasted on a second row of passenger seats.

        • Mpatch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Okay how old? We talking pre 2008? Because anything before that are pigs on fuel, perform significantly worse, and lack of basic saftey features.

            • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Efficiency has improved over the decades despite the trucks getting larger: https://carbuzz.com/ford-improved-f-150-fuel-economy-five-decades/ you’ll also see how the old inefficient engines had less power than the new more efficient ones.

              Electronic Stability Program became mandatory in the US in 2012 and the EU in 2014. I’ve driven a '05 Grand Cherokee that didn’t have it (or even traction control if I remember correctly), though German cars mostly started getting it in late 90s or early 00s. ESP can be an absolute godsend in the winter because unlike your right foot, it can control each wheel’s brakes individually to prevent skids.

              It’s not just trucks, all vehicles have gotten safer and more efficient over time because of regulations that have forced manufacturers to adopt new technologies. I’ve never heard anyone question this before, as it’s so widely known.

        • notgold@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          They still make single row ones. We have many at my workplace. Usually tradies that work for larger businesses or local governments use them. Smaller trade businesses generally the dual/super cab ones. They do have their uses but most people don’t use them for that purpose.

          Ranger XL single cab or Hilux single cab still around. The Holden Colorado was my favourite as someone that did a lot of long drives but that doesn’t exist anymore.

          At the end of the day, most people want to drive a bigger car because they feel safer when though the bigger vehicles are the problem.

          • Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Neat, I’ll retract the older part of my comment, if you absolutely need a pickup truck get one of those then. As for the safety thing, I’m aware of it, and I’m also aware of how psychopathic it is. Fuck you for wanting to have any chance of survival when I hit you, I don’t want to be hurt at the same time.

  • otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Honestly, this should be a ticket. Parked vehicle outside of a parking spot, obstructing traffic, etc.

    “Well what else am I supposed to do?”

    Use the truck parking spots.

    “But they’re far away/nonexistent”

    Take a cab or otherwise figure it out.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 hours ago

      “Well what else am I supposed to do?”

      Don’t care, that is your problem. I have a similar response to people complaining about roads not being increased in size because cars are getting larger. The road was here first, you then decided to buy a larger car. Really it seems like a you problem.

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Exactly.

      Just because your vehicle doesn’t fit in parking bays doesn’t mean you can just park anywhere you like.

  • stylusmobilus@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Not for long

    These will be pretty rare in 10 years time if things continue the way they are. That said I’m in a country adopting EVs, so YMMV

        • BreakerSwitch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I learned recently that the stated target demographic for the original hummer was “people who didn’t serve in the armed forces, but felt like they should” and it’s funnier every time I think of it. They knew their market SO well, and I’d been wondering for years “who the hell is this for?”

      • stylusmobilus@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        That’ll happen as well, but at least it’ll be a lot cleaner. I’m still of the mind there’ll be less.

        You do have a point though.

    • Ariselas@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      10 years? The longer Operation Epstein Fury drags on, these guys will be struggling to gas up in months.

      • stylusmobilus@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Yeah can’t argue with that

        That’s going to hurt too many of the wrong people, unfortunately, for the benefits in the end it will give.

        I just hope it doesn’t turn into Kuwait but the whole area.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Yeah, they will get even heavier so you will never see a road without craters in it

      • stylusmobilus@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Yeah nah as time goes by it’ll go the other way. Batteries will get lighter as tech improves.

        The argument going on about this reminds me of what my grandmother told me about the horse to car transition. Pretty much all the same stuff, including how big they were in comparison to a horse.

        • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          But people keep buying bigger cars. We are able to build small cars it’s just that almost no one is buying them.

          • stylusmobilus@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Yeah you’re right it sucks. It’s mainly from what I can see, governments building legislation that gives tax breaks for these cars like happens here in Oz or manufacturers using politics to shut out especially smaller and trade EVs from over seas.

            You’re right though, however you are

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Well for now BEVs are still much heavier than ICE vehicles. It will take decades for them to finally become lighter than ICE vehicles.

          • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Well for now BEVs are still much heavier than ICE vehicles.

            only in the US, where people love tanks and can’t do math so they need to carry around 2000lbs of batteries.

          • stylusmobilus@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            In the meantime they’re still significantly cleaner

            Some need them, and if we have to have them better they’re electric.

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Honestly, even if we ignore how obscenely selfish and un-neighborly this guy is being, even if we assume he only cares about himself and his emotional support vehicle…shouldn’t that make him worry about that truck getting hit by someone driving by? How many times is he going to lose his truck’s bumper because he parks it with the nose sticking halfway through the travel lane?

    • Mpatch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Diesel probably gets 1200km ± 200km per full tank approx 120L tank size. So 240$ cad for a full tank. It’s still nothing compared to the new imports using turbo 4s and having to put in premium. Because of the NOx reduction legislation.

  • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    17 hours ago

    This, but in traffic unsafely blocking my left line of sight so I can’t safely do anything until they take their sweet time trying to go.

    …At least during a turn I can “use” them as protected cover.